# AI/LLM Infrastructure: Comprehensive Guide for Custom Application Development ## Introduction AI/LLM infrastructure encompasses the complete ecosystem of hardware, software, platforms, and operational practices required to develop, deploy, scale, and maintain custom applications with Generative AI and Large Language Model components. This infrastructure addresses critical challenges in computational resource management, cost optimization, performance tuning, security compliance, and operational reliability at scale. As organizations move from experimental prototypes to production-grade LLM applications, they must navigate complex tradeoffs between cloud vs. on-premise deployment, manage massive GPU compute requirements, implement robust monitoring and observability systems, optimize inference latency and throughput, ensure data privacy and regulatory compliance, and establish sustainable cost models. The infrastructure landscape spans hardware considerations (GPUs, CPUs, memory, storage, networking), deployment strategies (cloud, on-premise, hybrid, edge), serving and optimization techniques (batching, caching, quantization, model parallelism), operational platforms (LLMOps tools, orchestration frameworks, API gateways), and governance mechanisms (security, compliance, monitoring, cost management). This comprehensive guide explores the full spectrum of infrastructure components, patterns, and best practices that enable organizations to build reliable, scalable, cost-effective, and compliant LLM-powered applications. --- ## Table 1: Hardware & Compute Infrastructure | Technique/Approach/Type | Description | Main Usages | Advantages | Considerations | Example | Reference | |------------------------|-------------|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------| | **GPU Compute (NVIDIA H100/H200)** | High-performance GPUs with massive parallel processing capabilities, HBM3e memory, and specialized tensor cores for AI workloads | LLM training, high-throughput inference, real-time applications requiring <100ms latency | Superior performance (H200: 4.8 TB/s bandwidth, 141GB HBM3e), optimized for transformer architectures, industry-standard support | Very high cost ($25k-40k per GPU), power consumption 700W+, limited availability, requires specialized cooling | 8x H200 cluster with NVLink 4.0 for training 70B parameter models | 1, 2, 7 | | **High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM)** | Stacked memory architecture providing 3-10x bandwidth vs traditional GDDR, critical for memory-bound LLM operations | KV cache storage, model weights loading, reducing memory bottlenecks during inference | Dramatically faster data access (819GB/s in M3 Ultra), reduces inference latency, enables larger batch sizes | Limited capacity (typically 80-200GB), expensive, tied to specific GPU/accelerator architectures | H200 with 141GB HBM3e supporting 2048 token/sec throughput for 13B models | 2, 5, 11 | | **NVLink/NVSwitch Interconnect** | High-speed GPU-to-GPU communication fabric enabling GPU clustering (up to 900 GB/s with NVLink-C2C) | Multi-GPU training, distributed inference, model parallelism across GPUs | 10-50x faster than PCIe, enables unified memory architectures, reduces communication bottlenecks | Only available in high-end server configurations, adds infrastructure complexity | 8-GPU server with NVSwitch creating shared 1TB memory pool for LLM training | 2, 7, 14 | | **CPU + System Memory** | High-core-count CPUs with large RAM for data preprocessing, system coordination, and KV cache offloading | Data preprocessing, tokenization, system orchestration, KV cache overflow handling | Cost-effective for non-inference tasks, enables CPU-GPU memory sharing architectures, handles async operations | Much slower than GPU for model inference (50-100x), high latency for model execution | 256GB RAM + 32-core CPU handling preprocessing while GPUs run inference | 5, 9, 11 | | **NVMe SSD Storage** | Ultra-fast solid-state storage for datasets, model checkpoints, and streaming data to GPUs | Loading training data, checkpoint storage, model artifacts, reducing I/O bottlenecks | 7GB/s sequential read speeds, low latency random access, supports concurrent workloads | Limited capacity relative to HDD, wear over time, expensive per TB | 8TB NVMe array providing model checkpoint storage with <5s save times | 3, 18 | | **High-Speed Networking (InfiniBand/RoCE)** | Low-latency, high-bandwidth networking for distributed training and multi-node inference (100-400 Gbps) | Distributed training across nodes, parameter synchronization, multi-node model serving | Sub-microsecond latency, RDMA support, essential for scaling beyond single-node | Expensive switches and NICs, complex network topology design, requires specialized expertise | 400 Gbps InfiniBR network enabling 1000-GPU training cluster for foundation models | 1, 10, 16 | | **TPU (Tensor Processing Units)** | Google's custom AI accelerators optimized for TensorFlow and JAX workloads | Large-scale training on Google Cloud, inference for specific model architectures | Superior performance/cost for supported frameworks, excellent for batch processing | Limited ecosystem support, vendor lock-in to Google Cloud, fewer community resources | TPU v5 pods for training PaLM-540B model with pod-level parallelism | 8, 12 | | **Apple Silicon (M3/M4 Ultra)** | Unified memory architecture integrating CPU/GPU/Neural Engine with up to 192GB shared memory | Local development, prototyping, CPU-based inference for smaller models (7-13B) | Excellent power efficiency, unified memory eliminates PCIe bottleneck, silent operation | Limited to macOS ecosystem, not suitable for production-scale deployments, model size limitations | M3 Ultra with 192GB running Llama 2 13B at 35 tokens/sec for local development | 5, 13 | | **AI Accelerators (AWS Trainium/Inferentia)** | Cloud provider-specific chips optimized for ML training/inference with competitive price-performance | Training and inference on AWS, cost-sensitive production deployments | 40-70% cost savings vs GPU equivalents, good performance for standard architectures | Vendor lock-in, limited framework support, requires code modifications | AWS Inferentia2 serving GPT-NeoX 20B at 50% lower cost than GPU instances | 8, 15 | | **Network-Attached Storage (NAS)** | Centralized storage accessible over network for shared datasets and model artifacts | Multi-user development environments, shared training datasets, model repository | Centralized management, easy backup/recovery, supports collaborative development | Network latency for data access, bandwidth contention with multiple users | 100TB NAS serving training data to 50-node GPU cluster via 100 Gbps Ethernet | 3, 19 | --- ## Table 2: Deployment Strategies & Patterns | Technique/Approach/Type | Description | Main Usages | Advantages | Considerations | Example | Reference | |------------------------|-------------|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------| | **Cloud API Services** | Managed LLM APIs from providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, AWS) accessed via REST endpoints | Rapid prototyping, variable workloads, applications without sensitive data | Zero infrastructure management, instant scalability, pay-per-use pricing, always latest models | Ongoing API costs, data privacy concerns, vendor lock-in, limited customization | Using OpenAI GPT-4 API for customer support chatbot processing 100k requests/month | 20, 21, 22 | | **On-Premise Deployment** | Self-hosted infrastructure with dedicated hardware for model training and inference | Sensitive data applications, regulatory compliance (HIPAA/GDPR), predictable high-volume workloads | Complete data control, predictable costs at scale, no data egress, customizable | High upfront capital ($500k-5M+), requires ML expertise, longer setup time (3-6 months) | Healthcare organization running Llama 2 70B on-premise for HIPAA-compliant patient data analysis | 21, 22, 23, 24 | | **Hybrid Cloud-Edge** | Distributed architecture with inference on edge devices and compute-intensive tasks in cloud | Real-time applications, bandwidth-constrained environments, privacy-sensitive scenarios | Reduces latency to <50ms, minimizes data transfer, balances cost and performance | Complex orchestration, model synchronization challenges, increased management overhead | Mobile app with 7B model on-device for offline use, offloading complex queries to cloud GPT-4 | 22, 24, 25, 26 | | **Private Cloud (VPC)** | LLMs deployed within organization's virtual private cloud with isolated networking | Enterprise applications requiring data isolation but cloud scalability | Better security than public APIs, regulatory compliance, leverages cloud infrastructure | Higher costs than public APIs, requires cloud infrastructure expertise | Llama 2 70B deployed in AWS VPC with PrivateLink for internal enterprise applications | 23, 27, 28 | | **Serverless/Function-as-a-Service** | Auto-scaling inference endpoints that scale to zero when not in use | Intermittent workloads, cost-sensitive applications, development/testing environments | Pay only for actual usage, zero idle costs, instant scaling, simplified operations | Cold start latency (10-60s), limited GPU support, unsuitable for sustained loads | AWS Lambda with containerized 3B model for processing 1000 requests/day | 15, 29, 30 | | **Containerized Deployment** | Models packaged in Docker/OCI containers for consistent deployment across environments | Multi-environment deployments, CI/CD pipelines, Kubernetes orchestration | Consistency across dev/prod, easy version management, portable, supports orchestration | Container overhead, requires container expertise, image size for LLMs (5-50GB) | vLLM inference server containerized with Docker, deployed via Kubernetes across 20 nodes | 31, 32, 33, 34 | | **Edge Deployment** | Running quantized models directly on edge devices (smartphones, IoT, embedded systems) | Offline-capable apps, ultra-low latency (<10ms), privacy-critical applications | Zero cloud costs, works offline, sub-10ms latency, complete data privacy | Limited model sizes (<3B params), lower accuracy vs cloud, device fragmentation | 1.5B quantized model on smartphone for real-time translation without internet | 35, 36, 37, 38 | | **Multi-Region Deployment** | Models deployed across geographic regions for global availability and disaster recovery | Global applications, high availability requirements, regulatory data residency | Reduced latency for global users, disaster recovery, data residency compliance | Increased complexity, higher costs, model version synchronization challenges | Llama 2 deployed in US-East, EU-West, and Asia-Pacific regions with geo-routing | 24, 39, 40 | | **Hybrid On-Premise/Cloud** | Strategic allocation of workloads between on-premise and cloud based on characteristics | Organizations transitioning to cloud, balancing control and scalability | Flexibility for different workload types, gradual migration path, optimized cost | Complex management, data synchronization overhead, split expertise requirements | Sensitive data processed on-premise, non-sensitive batch jobs in cloud for cost savings | 21, 22, 24, 26 | --- ## Table 3: Model Serving & Inference Optimization | Technique/Approach/Type | Description | Main Usages | Advantages | Considerations | Example | Reference | |------------------------|-------------|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------| | **Continuous Batching** | Dynamic batching that adds new requests to in-progress batches, maximizing GPU utilization | High-throughput production serving, multi-user applications | 2-10x throughput improvement vs static batching, better latency-throughput balance | Complex implementation, requires careful tuning, framework support needed | vLLM achieving 23x throughput with continuous batching for GPT-NeoX serving | 41, 42, 43, 44 | | **KV Cache Optimization** | Efficient management of key-value caches to reduce redundant computation in autoregressive generation | All production LLM inference, reducing memory usage and latency | 10-30% memory savings, faster token generation, enables larger batch sizes | Memory-compute tradeoffs, cache eviction strategies needed | PagedAttention in vLLM reducing KV cache waste from 60% to <10% | 42, 43, 45, 46 | | **Model Quantization (INT8/INT4)** | Reducing model precision from FP16/FP32 to INT8/INT4 to decrease memory and increase speed | Resource-constrained deployments, cost optimization, edge inference | 2-4x memory reduction, 1.5-3x speedup, minimal accuracy loss (<2%) | Slight quality degradation, quantization overhead, framework support required | 70B model quantized to INT4 running on single 24GB GPU vs 4 GPUs for FP16 | 47, 48, 49, 50 | | **Speculative Decoding** | Using smaller draft model to predict tokens, verified by larger model, accelerating generation | Latency-sensitive applications, real-time chat, interactive systems | 2-3x speedup for generation, maintains full model quality, works with existing models | Requires compatible draft model, tuning needed, limited speedup for some workloads | 7B draft model + 70B target model achieving 2.5x speedup for chat applications | 43, 46, 51 | | **Flash Attention** | Memory-efficient attention mechanism reducing memory bandwidth bottleneck | Large context windows (>4k tokens), memory-constrained environments | 2-4x faster attention, enables 10x longer contexts, reduced memory usage | Requires specific GPU compute capabilities, implementation complexity | Llama 2 70B with 32k context using FlashAttention vs 4k without | 41, 46, 52 | | **Model Parallelism (Tensor/Pipeline)** | Splitting model across multiple GPUs via tensor or pipeline parallelism | Models too large for single GPU (>100B params), multi-GPU training/inference | Enables serving massive models, linear scaling with GPUs, efficient resource use | Communication overhead, pipeline bubbles, complex implementation | GPT-3 175B split across 8 GPUs using tensor parallelism with 85% efficiency | 41, 53, 54 | | **Prefix Caching** | Reusing computed KV caches for common prompt prefixes across requests | RAG systems with fixed system prompts, multi-turn conversations | 2-5x latency reduction for repeated prompts, reduced compute costs | Cache management overhead, storage requirements, cache invalidation complexity | RAG system caching vector search context, reducing latency from 2s to 400ms | 43, 55, 56 | | **Prompt Compression** | Reducing prompt token count while preserving semantic meaning | Cost optimization, latency reduction, context window management | 40-80% token reduction, proportional cost savings, faster processing | May lose nuance, requires validation, compression overhead | Compressing 2000-token context to 500 tokens with <5% quality impact | 57, 58 | | **Adaptive Batching** | Dynamically adjusting batch size based on request complexity and available resources | Variable workload patterns, SLA-driven serving | Optimizes latency-throughput tradeoff dynamically, better resource utilization | Requires sophisticated scheduler, tuning complexity | Triton Inference Server dynamically batching 1-32 requests based on GPU load | 43, 46, 59, 60 | | **Multi-Query Attention (MQA)** | Sharing key-value projections across attention heads to reduce KV cache size | Memory-constrained inference, increasing batch size capacity | 2-4x KV cache reduction, minimal quality impact, enables larger batches | Requires retraining or architecture change, slight quality tradeoff | Llama 3 using MQA to fit 3x more concurrent requests in same GPU memory | 41, 52 | --- ## Table 4: Model Compression & Quantization Formats | Technique/Approach/Type | Description | Main Usages | Advantages | Considerations | Example | Reference | |------------------------|-------------|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------| | **GPTQ (GPU Quantization)** | Layer-wise post-training quantization using second-order information for 4-bit precision | GPU inference optimization, model compression for deployment | High accuracy retention (>95%), fast GPU inference, widely supported | GPU-only, one-time quantization process, requires calibration data | Llama 2 70B quantized with GPTQ to 4-bit, running on single 48GB GPU | 61, 62, 63, 64 | | **AWQ (Activation-aware Weight Quantization)** | Protects important weights based on activation statistics during quantization | High-quality 4-bit inference on GPUs, production deployments | Best accuracy among 4-bit methods, optimized for GPU inference engines like vLLM | Limited ecosystem support vs GPTQ, requires activation analysis | Mistral 7B AWQ achieving 99% of FP16 quality at 4-bit with vLLM | 61, 62, 63, 64 | | **GGUF (GGML Universal Format)** | Standardized format for CPU/GPU quantization with multiple precision levels (Q4_K_M, Q8_0) | Local inference with llama.cpp/Ollama, CPU-based serving, consumer hardware | Best CPU performance, flexible quantization levels, cross-platform compatibility | Slower than GPU methods, limited production tooling, less suitable for scale | 13B model as GGUF Q4_K_M running on MacBook Pro at 20 tokens/sec | 61, 62, 65, 66 | | **BitsAndBytes (NF4/INT8)** | On-the-fly quantization integrated with HuggingFace transformers for training and inference | Memory-efficient fine-tuning (QLoRA), inference on consumer GPUs | Seamless integration with transformers, good for fine-tuning, dynamic quantization | Slower than pre-quantized formats, requires CUDA, less optimal for pure inference | Fine-tuning 65B model on single 48GB GPU using NF4 quantization | 64, 67, 68 | | **SmoothQuant** | Migrating quantization difficulty from activations to weights through scaling | INT8 inference maintaining high accuracy, balanced quantization | Better accuracy than naive INT8, hardware-friendly INT8 operations | Requires calibration, limited framework support, newer technique | LLaMA 65B with SmoothQuant INT8 achieving 99.5% accuracy vs FP16 | 62, 69 | | **FP8 Quantization** | 8-bit floating point format with hardware support in modern GPUs (H100+) | Training and inference on latest GPUs, maintaining high dynamic range | Native H100 support, faster than INT8, better dynamic range than fixed-point | Requires H100/H200 GPUs, limited software ecosystem, newer standard | GPT-3 training with FP8 achieving 2x speedup on H100 clusters | 70, 71 | | **Dynamic Quantization** | On-the-fly quantization during inference without model modification | Inference where model can't be modified, quick deployment scenarios | No model retraining needed, flexible precision per layer | Higher inference overhead, suboptimal performance vs static quantization | Converting PyTorch model to dynamic INT8 quantization with 1-line change | 68, 72 | | **Mixed Precision (INT4/INT8/FP16)** | Using different precision levels for different model layers based on sensitivity | Balancing quality and performance, optimizing specific model architectures | Optimal quality-performance tradeoff, customizable per layer | Complex calibration, requires sensitivity analysis, manual tuning | Quantizing FFN layers to INT4, attention to INT8, keeping embeddings at FP16 | 62, 73 | --- ## Table 5: LLMOps & Orchestration Platforms | Technique/Approach/Type | Description | Main Usages | Advantages | Considerations | Example | Reference | |------------------------|-------------|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------| | **MLflow (Model Registry & Tracking)** | Open-source platform for experiment tracking, model versioning, and deployment management | Experiment tracking, model registry, A/B testing, deployment orchestration | Industry standard, framework-agnostic, extensive integrations, active community | Limited LLM-specific features, requires infrastructure setup, basic UI | Tracking 100 fine-tuning experiments with hyperparameters, metrics, and model artifacts | 74, 75, 76, 77 | | **ZenML (Pipeline Orchestration)** | Production ML/LLM pipeline framework with reproducibility and tooling integrations | End-to-end LLM pipelines, RAG workflows, multi-step orchestration | Production-ready pipelines, reproducibility focus, multiple orchestrator support | Steeper learning curve, requires infrastructure setup | Building reproducible RAG pipeline: ingestion → embedding → indexing → serving | 78, 79, 80 | | **Kubeflow** | Kubernetes-native ML platform for orchestrating training, serving, and pipelines | K8s-based ML workflows, distributed training, model serving at scale | Native K8s integration, enterprise-grade, handles distributed training well | Complex setup, K8s expertise required, heavyweight for simple use cases | Orchestrating distributed LLM fine-tuning across 32 GPUs on GKE | 81, 82 | | **Airflow (Data/ML Pipelines)** | Workflow orchestration for scheduling and monitoring complex data/ML pipelines | Scheduled LLM workflows, data preprocessing, batch inference pipelines | Mature ecosystem, flexible, strong scheduling, extensive integrations | Not ML-specific, requires Python expertise, limited built-in ML features | Daily pipeline: fetch data → preprocess → batch inference → store results | 83, 84 | | **Weights & Biases (W&B)** | Experiment tracking and visualization platform with LLM evaluation features | Hyperparameter tuning, experiment comparison, LLM prompt evaluation | Beautiful visualizations, collaborative features, production monitoring | Proprietary platform, costs at scale, requires internet connectivity | Tracking 500 LoRA fine-tuning experiments with automatic metric visualization | 78, 85, 86 | | **Prefect** | Modern workflow orchestration with dynamic workflows and better DX than Airflow | Dynamic LLM pipelines, event-driven workflows, real-time orchestration | Better Python UX than Airflow, dynamic DAGs, built-in error handling | Smaller community than Airflow, fewer integrations, newer platform | Dynamic RAG pipeline adapting based on query type and document availability | 84, 87 | | **Ray (Distributed Compute)** | Python framework for distributed computing powering training and serving at scale | Large-scale training, distributed inference, hyperparameter tuning | Scales Python code seamlessly, handles distributed systems complexity, strong ML focus | Requires distributed systems knowledge, debugging complexity | Distributed LoRA fine-tuning across 128 GPUs with RayTrain | 88, 89 | | **LangSmith (LangChain Observability)** | Purpose-built observability and evaluation platform for LangChain applications | LangChain app monitoring, prompt testing, production tracing | Native LangChain integration, prompt playground, evaluation datasets | LangChain-specific, limited to LangChain ecosystem | Monitoring LangChain agent with 5 tools, tracing every LLM call and tool invocation | 90, 91 | | **ClearML** | End-to-end MLOps platform with experiment tracking, orchestration, and serving | Complete MLOps workflows, model versioning, resource management | All-in-one solution, good UI, auto-logging capabilities | Heavier than specialized tools, learning curve for full features | Managing 50 LLM fine-tuning jobs with automatic resource allocation | 92, 93 | | **Flyte** | Cloud-native workflow orchestration with strong typing and versioning | Complex multi-step ML workflows, data+model versioning, reproducibility | Type-safe workflows, versioning by default, K8s-native | Requires K8s, learning curve for workflow definitions | Multi-stage pipeline: data prep → training → evaluation → deployment with rollback | 84, 94 | --- ## Table 6: Observability & Monitoring | Technique/Approach/Type | Description | Main Usages | Advantages | Considerations | Example | Reference | |------------------------|-------------|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------| | **LLM Tracing** | Capturing detailed logs of prompts, completions, metadata, and latency for every LLM call | Debugging production issues, performance analysis, quality improvement | Complete visibility into LLM behavior, essential for debugging, enables optimization | Storage costs for high volume, PII concerns in logs | Langfuse tracing showing 2.5s spent in RAG retrieval vs 800ms in LLM generation | 95, 96, 97, 98 | | **Token Usage Tracking** | Monitoring input/output tokens per request for cost attribution and optimization | Cost management, chargeback/showback, budget enforcement | Granular cost visibility, enables team/user budgeting, identifies expensive queries | Requires integration with all LLM calls, attribution tagging overhead | Dashboard showing Team A consumed $12k tokens vs Team B's $3k in last month | 99, 100, 101 | | **Quality Metrics (LLM-as-Judge)** | Using LLMs to evaluate output quality dimensions (relevance, hallucination, toxicity) | Production quality monitoring, regression detection, A/B testing | Scalable automated evaluation, catches quality degradation early | Judge model costs, potential judge model bias, not 100% accurate | GPT-4 judging 1000 support responses daily for helpfulness and accuracy scores | 95, 96, 102 | | **Latency Monitoring** | Tracking end-to-end latency, TTFT (time to first token), and token generation speed | SLA compliance, performance optimization, user experience | Identifies bottlenecks, enables SLA enforcement, tracks performance trends | Requires instrumentation at multiple layers, interpretation challenges | Datadog dashboard showing P95 latency increased from 1.2s to 2.8s after deployment | 95, 103, 104 | | **Cost Attribution & FinOps** | Tagging requests with team/user/feature metadata for granular cost tracking | Multi-tenant cost tracking, budget management, cost optimization | Enables chargeback, identifies cost hotspots, supports budgeting | Requires consistent tagging discipline, metadata propagation complexity | Per-user cost tracking showing top 10 users consuming 60% of LLM budget | 99, 100, 105 | | **Error Rate Tracking** | Monitoring API errors, timeouts, rate limits, and content policy violations | Production reliability, alerting, incident response | Early problem detection, enables proactive response, tracks reliability trends | Defining meaningful error categories, avoiding alert fatigue | Alert triggered when error rate exceeds 5% threshold (20 failures in 5 min) | 95, 104, 106 | | **Prompt Analytics** | Analyzing prompt patterns, lengths, and performance across different prompt types | Prompt engineering, optimization, identifying problematic patterns | Data-driven prompt improvement, identifies inefficient patterns | Storage costs, requires text analytics, privacy considerations | Analysis showing prompts >1500 tokens have 3x higher latency with no quality gain | 96, 107, 108 | | **Real-time Dashboards** | Live visualization of key metrics (throughput, latency, costs, errors) | Operations monitoring, stakeholder visibility, incident response | Immediate visibility, enables quick decision-making, supports communication | Dashboard maintenance overhead, information overload risk | Grafana dashboard with LLM requests/min, P95 latency, hourly costs, error rates | 95, 103, 109 | | **Evaluation Dataset Management** | Curating and versioning test datasets for systematic LLM evaluation | Regression testing, model comparison, quality benchmarking | Reproducible evaluation, tracks quality over time, supports A/B testing | Dataset curation effort, keeping datasets current, storage costs | 500-sample eval set testing accuracy, relevance, toxicity after each deployment | 96, 102, 110 | | **Distributed Tracing (OpenTelemetry)** | Standards-based tracing across microservices including LLM calls | Complex microservice architectures, end-to-end visibility | Standard protocol, tool-agnostic, correlates LLM with other services | Setup complexity, requires OTel integration across stack | Trace showing request flow: API → Auth → RAG → Vector DB → LLM → Cache → Response | 97, 111, 112 | --- ## Table 7: API Gateways & Load Management | Technique/Approach/Type | Description | Main Usages | Advantages | Considerations | Example | Reference | |------------------------|-------------|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------| | **LLM API Gateway** | Unified API layer abstracting multiple LLM providers with routing, auth, and observability | Multi-provider deployments, vendor flexibility, centralized control | Single integration point, easy provider switching, centralized monitoring | Additional latency (~5-20ms), single point of failure if not HA | LiteLLM gateway routing to OpenAI, Anthropic, and Azure OpenAI based on load | 113, 114, 115, 116 | | **Rate Limiting (Token-based)** | Controlling request/token throughput per user, team, or API key to prevent abuse | Cost control, fair resource allocation, preventing abuse | Prevents cost runaway, ensures fair usage, protects backend from overload | Requires tracking state, defining appropriate limits, handling limit errors | Limiting users to 100k tokens/day, with burst allowance of 10k tokens/min | 117, 118, 119 | | **Load Balancing** | Distributing requests across multiple model instances or providers for performance | High availability, utilizing multiple API keys/accounts, geographic distribution | Prevents single instance overload, improves reliability, leverages regional pricing | Sticky session challenges, model version consistency | Round-robin across 5 API keys, falling back to secondary provider on errors | 113, 120, 121, 122 | | **Failover & Fallback** | Automatic switching to backup LLM provider when primary fails or is rate limited | Production reliability, handling provider outages, rate limit mitigation | Improved uptime (99.9%+), handles provider issues transparently | Requires compatible backup models, prompt compatibility considerations | Primary: GPT-4, Fallback: Claude 3.5, Tertiary: Llama 3 70B on-premise | 113, 114, 123 | | **Request Queueing** | Buffering requests during high load for orderly processing | Handling traffic spikes, batch processing, cost optimization | Smooths load spikes, prevents backend overload, enables batching | Increased latency during peak, queue size limits, requires timeout handling | Queue absorbing 1000 req/min spike, processing at steady 200 req/min | 124, 125 | | **Caching (Semantic/Exact)** | Storing LLM responses for identical or semantically similar requests | Cost reduction, latency improvement, handling repeated queries | 40-80% cost reduction for repeated queries, instant responses (<10ms) | Cache invalidation complexity, storage costs, semantic matching accuracy | Caching FAQ responses with 75% hit rate, reducing costs by $8k/month | 114, 126, 127 | | **Smart Routing (Cost/Latency/Quality)** | Dynamically routing requests to optimal model based on query complexity and requirements | Cost optimization, latency reduction, quality assurance | 30-50% cost savings, appropriate model for task, maintains quality thresholds | Routing logic complexity, classification overhead, tuning required | Simple queries → GPT-3.5, complex → GPT-4, coding → GPT-4 Turbo | 113, 114, 128 | | **Virtual Keys & Quotas** | Creating logical API keys with budgets and permissions for multi-tenant access | Multi-tenant SaaS, team budgets, access control | Granular access control, budget enforcement per key, detailed usage tracking | Key management overhead, quota exhaustion handling | Team A key: $500/month quota, Team B: $2k/month, automatically enforced | 116, 117, 129 | | **Retry Logic with Backoff** | Automatically retrying failed requests with exponential backoff strategy | Handling transient failures, rate limit recovery, reliability | Improves reliability without manual intervention, handles temporary issues | Can mask persistent problems, adds latency, may hit rate limits faster | Retry with 1s, 2s, 4s delays on 5xx errors, max 3 attempts | 114, 130 | | **Multi-Region Gateway** | Deploying gateway instances across regions for global latency optimization | Global applications, disaster recovery, regional compliance | Reduced latency for global users, improved reliability, data residency | Increased infrastructure costs, configuration sync complexity | Gateway in US-East, EU-West, Asia-Pacific with geo-routing and failover | 113, 131 | --- ## Table 8: Security, Privacy & Compliance | Technique/Approach/Type | Description | Main Usages | Advantages | Considerations | Example | Reference | |------------------------|-------------|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------| | **Data Anonymization/Masking** | Removing or replacing PII in prompts before sending to LLM | GDPR compliance, protecting user privacy, reducing data exposure | Enables LLM use with sensitive data, reduces compliance risk | May impact model quality, requires robust PII detection, overhead | Replacing names, emails, SSNs with tokens before sending to LLM | 132, 133, 134 | | **Private LLM Deployment** | Hosting models within organization's security perimeter | HIPAA/GDPR compliance, highly sensitive data, zero trust environments | Complete data control, meets strictest regulations, no data leakage risk | High infrastructure costs, requires ML expertise, maintenance burden | Healthcare provider running Llama 2 on-premise for patient data analysis | 133, 135, 136 | | **Data Residency Controls** | Ensuring data and models stay within specific geographic regions | EU GDPR Article 48, Chinese data laws, regional regulations | Meets regional compliance, faster local access, avoids data transfer risks | Limits provider options, higher costs, complex multi-region management | EU customer data processed only by models in EU-West Azure region | 133, 137, 138 | | **Input/Output Filtering (Guardrails)** | Scanning prompts and responses for sensitive content, PII, toxicity, jailbreaks | Content moderation, preventing data leaks, safety compliance | Prevents sensitive data exposure, blocks harmful outputs, safety layer | False positives, latency overhead (50-200ms), maintaining filter rules | Blocking prompts containing credit card numbers, filtering toxic responses | 139, 140, 141 | | **Access Control & RBAC** | Role-based permissions for LLM access, model selection, and data visibility | Enterprise applications, multi-tenant systems, least privilege enforcement | Prevents unauthorized access, limits blast radius, audit trail | Management overhead, permission complexity, balancing security and UX | Data analysts can use GPT-3.5, only senior engineers can access GPT-4 | 142, 143 | | **Audit Logging** | Comprehensive logging of all LLM interactions for compliance and security | SOC 2, GDPR Article 30, security investigations, compliance audits | Enables compliance demonstrations, security forensics, accountability | Storage costs, PII in logs challenges, retention policies | Immutable log of every prompt/response with user, timestamp, model used | 133, 144, 145 | | **Encryption (Transit & At-Rest)** | TLS for API calls, encrypted storage for models and data | HIPAA, PCI-DSS, general security best practices | Protects data confidentiality, meets compliance requirements | Key management overhead, performance impact (minimal for TLS) | TLS 1.3 for all API traffic, AES-256 for stored model weights and logs | 133, 146 | | **DLP (Data Loss Prevention)** | Automated detection and blocking of sensitive data in prompts/responses | Preventing accidental data leaks, compliance enforcement | Proactive data protection, reduces insider threat, automated enforcement | False positives, integration complexity, performance overhead | DLP blocking employee attempting to paste source code into ChatGPT | 147, 148 | | **Model Access Governance** | Policies controlling which models can be used for which data classifications | Risk management, compliance, cost control | Ensures appropriate model for data sensitivity, reduces compliance risk | Policy enforcement complexity, user education needed | Public data → any model, internal data → private models only | 133, 149 | | **Prompt Injection Protection** | Detecting and blocking adversarial prompts attempting to manipulate model behavior | Security hardening, preventing abuse, protecting system prompts | Prevents jailbreaks, protects prompt IP, reduces abuse | Evolving attack vectors, false positives, performance overhead | Detecting and blocking "ignore previous instructions" patterns | 139, 141, 150 | --- ## Table 9: Cost Optimization & Management | Technique/Approach/Type | Description | Main Usages | Advantages | Considerations | Example | Reference | |------------------------|-------------|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------| | **Model Right-Sizing** | Selecting smallest model that meets quality requirements for each use case | Cost optimization, performance tuning, resource efficiency | 5-10x cost reduction by using appropriate model sizes | Requires testing, may sacrifice quality, ongoing monitoring needed | Using GPT-3.5 for simple tasks, GPT-4 only for complex reasoning | 151, 152, 153 | | **Prompt Optimization** | Reducing token count through concise prompts while maintaining effectiveness | Reducing per-request costs, latency improvement | 15-40% token reduction, proportional cost and latency savings | Requires prompt engineering, validation effort, may reduce quality | Reducing 800-token prompt to 450 tokens with same quality output | 154, 155 | | **Response Length Limiting** | Setting max_tokens parameter to prevent unnecessarily long responses | Cost control, predictable latency, preventing runaway generation | Prevents cost overruns, predictable pricing, faster responses | May truncate useful responses, requires tuning per use case | Limiting customer support responses to 300 tokens max | 156, 157 | | **Batch Processing** | Processing multiple requests together in off-peak times at lower priority/cost | Async workflows, non-time-sensitive analysis, cost-sensitive workloads | 50% cost reduction with batch APIs, maximizes throughput efficiency | Higher latency (minutes to hours), requires async architecture | OpenAI Batch API processing 10k document summaries overnight at 50% discount | 158, 159 | | **Caching Strategies** | Implementing multi-layer caching (exact match, semantic, prefix) | Reducing redundant LLM calls, cost optimization | 40-80% cost reduction for repeated/similar queries | Cache invalidation complexity, storage costs, accuracy tradeoffs | FAQ system with 85% cache hit rate reducing costs from $15k to $3k/month | 126, 127, 160 | | **Usage Quotas & Budgets** | Setting spending limits per user, team, project, or time period | Budget control, preventing overruns, fair allocation | Prevents budget surprises, enforces allocation policies | Handling quota exhaustion, user communication challenges | Monthly budget of $5k per team with alerts at 80% and hard stop at 100% | 161, 162, 163 | | **Spot Instance Usage** | Using preemptible GPU instances for fault-tolerant training/inference | Training, batch inference, cost-sensitive workloads | 60-80% cost savings vs on-demand, good for interruptible work | Can be preempted, requires checkpoint/restart logic, limited availability | Fine-tuning on AWS spot instances at $8/hr vs $32/hr on-demand | 164, 165, 166 | | **Token Streaming** | Streaming responses token-by-token for better perceived latency | User-facing chat applications, improving UX | Better UX, can stop generation early, reduced perceived latency | Doesn't reduce cost/compute, implementation complexity | Chat interface showing responses in real-time vs waiting for complete response | 167, 168 | | **Multi-Tenancy with Shared Infrastructure** | Serving multiple customers/teams from shared model instances | SaaS applications, enterprise platforms, resource maximization | Better GPU utilization, lower per-customer cost, simplified operations | Isolation challenges, noisy neighbor issues, fair scheduling needed | Single 8-GPU cluster serving 50 teams with request isolation | 169, 170 | | **FinOps Practices** | Applying cloud FinOps principles to LLM spending (visibility, allocation, optimization) | Enterprise LLM operations, cost management, accountability | Data-driven cost decisions, cost awareness culture, continuous optimization | Requires tooling and processes, cultural change, ongoing effort | Monthly FinOps review identifying $20k savings opportunity from prompt optimization | 171, 172, 173 | --- ## Table 10: Infrastructure Automation & Scaling | Technique/Approach/Type | Description | Main Usages | Advantages | Considerations | Example | Reference | |------------------------|-------------|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------| | **Horizontal Pod Autoscaling (HPA)** | Automatically scaling number of serving pods based on CPU, memory, or custom metrics | Kubernetes-based deployments, variable load, cost optimization | Automatic capacity adjustment, cost savings during low load, handles traffic spikes | Scaling delay (1-5 min), requires metrics configuration, cold start considerations | Scaling from 2 to 10 vLLM pods when request queue exceeds 100 | 174, 175, 176 | | **GPU Auto-Scaling** | Dynamic allocation of GPU resources based on demand using cloud or K8s | Cloud deployments, cost optimization, handling variable traffic | Pay only for used capacity, rapid scale-up, handles unpredictable load | Cloud GPU availability, scaling lag (2-10 min), cost of scaling operations | Scaling GPU nodes from 2 to 8 based on inference queue depth | 164, 174, 177, 178 | | **Serverless Scaling** | Automatic scale-to-zero and scale-up based on request volume | Intermittent workloads, dev/test environments, cost-sensitive applications | Zero cost when idle, instant scale-up, simplified capacity planning | Cold start penalty (10-60s), unsuitable for sustained load, limited GPU support | AWS Lambda-based inference scaling from 0 to 100 concurrent executions | 179, 180 | | **Infrastructure as Code (IaC)** | Managing infrastructure through version-controlled code (Terraform, CloudFormation) | Reproducible deployments, multi-environment management, disaster recovery | Reproducible infrastructure, version control, easy rollback, documentation as code | Learning curve, state management, requires DevOps expertise | Terraform managing 50-node GPU cluster configuration with git history | 181, 182 | | **GitOps for ML** | Git-based workflows for managing ML infrastructure and model deployments | Continuous deployment, audit trail, collaborative workflows | Version control for everything, easy rollback, approval workflows | Complexity for large models (GBs), requires CI/CD setup, tooling overhead | ArgoCD deploying new model versions automatically when merged to main | 183, 184 | | **Container Orchestration (K8s)** | Using Kubernetes to manage, scale, and maintain containerized LLM services | Production deployments, multi-service applications, enterprise environments | Industry standard, handles complex deployments, strong ecosystem | Complex learning curve, operational overhead, requires K8s expertise | 20-node K8s cluster with GPU nodes for inference, CPU nodes for preprocessing | 31, 33, 174, 185 | | **Checkpoint Management** | Automated saving and lifecycle management of training/fine-tuning checkpoints | Long training jobs, fault tolerance, experiment tracking | Enables recovery from failures, supports iterative training, audit trail | Storage costs (100GB-1TB per checkpoint), bandwidth for distributed storage | Automatic checkpointing every 2 hours to S3, keeping last 5 checkpoints | 186, 187, 188 | | **Model Versioning & Registry** | Centralized repository for model artifacts with versioning and metadata | Model lifecycle management, rollback capability, A/B testing | Enables rollback, tracks lineage, supports governance, facilitates collaboration | Storage costs, registry maintenance, requires discipline | MLflow registry with 50 model versions, each tagged with metrics and metadata | 74, 76, 189, 190 | | **CI/CD for ML** | Automated testing and deployment pipelines for ML models and infrastructure | Continuous model deployment, testing automation, quality assurance | Faster iteration, automated quality checks, reduces manual errors | Complexity of ML testing, GPU requirements for tests, pipeline maintenance | GitHub Actions running evaluation tests on every model update before deployment | 191, 192 | | **Blue-Green Deployments** | Running two production environments for zero-downtime model updates | Production model updates, minimizing risk, instant rollback | Zero downtime, instant rollback capability, testing in production before full switch | Doubles resource requirements during transition, routing complexity | Switching traffic from Blue (old model) to Green (new model) in 30 seconds | 193, 194 | --- ## Table 11: Distributed Training & Fine-Tuning Infrastructure | Technique/Approach/Type | Description | Main Usages | Advantages | Considerations | Example | Reference | |------------------------|-------------|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------| | **Data Parallelism** | Replicating model across multiple GPUs, splitting data batches across replicas | Training with large datasets, scaling to multiple GPUs | Simple to implement, linear scaling up to 8-16 GPUs, well-supported | Communication overhead, limited by batch size, diminishing returns beyond 16 GPUs | Training Llama 2 7B with 8-way data parallelism across DGX node | 195, 196 | | **Tensor Parallelism** | Splitting individual layers across multiple GPUs for very large models | Models >70B parameters, single-node multi-GPU | Enables large models on cluster, efficient for single-node, low latency | Complex implementation, requires high-bandwidth interconnect (NVLink) | GPT-3 175B with tensor parallelism across 8 A100 GPUs | 53, 195, 197 | | **Pipeline Parallelism** | Splitting model layers across GPUs, processing micro-batches in pipeline | Very large models, multi-node training | Scales to 100s of GPUs, efficient memory use, handles massive models | Pipeline bubbles reduce efficiency, complex to tune, increased latency | Training 540B model with 64-way pipeline parallelism across 16 nodes | 195, 198 | | **FSDP (Fully Sharded Data Parallel)** | Sharding model weights, gradients, and optimizer states across all GPUs | Large model training (>10B params), memory-constrained scenarios | Best memory efficiency, scales to 1000s of GPUs, supported by PyTorch | Complex configuration, communication overhead, requires fast interconnect | Training 70B model with FSDP across 32 A100s with 80% memory savings | 196, 199, 200 | | **DeepSpeed (ZeRO)** | Microsoft's training optimization with ZeRO stages for memory efficiency | Very large model training, limited GPU memory scenarios | Excellent memory efficiency, scales to 1000s of GPUs, active development | Learning curve, Microsoft ecosystem focus, some features require specific hardware | Training 176B model with DeepSpeed ZeRO-3 on 64 V100 GPUs | 201, 202 | | **Gradient Checkpointing** | Trading compute for memory by recomputing activations during backward pass | Training large models with limited GPU memory | 30-50% memory reduction, enables larger models, simple to enable | 30% slowdown, increased compute, may stress GPU thermals | Training 13B model on 24GB GPU with gradient checkpointing vs OOM without | 203, 204 | | **LoRA/QLoRA Fine-Tuning** | Parameter-efficient fine-tuning by training small adapter layers | Fine-tuning with limited compute, adapting pre-trained models | 100x fewer parameters to train, runs on consumer GPUs, multiple adapters per model | Slightly lower quality than full fine-tuning, limited to supported architectures | Fine-tuning Llama 2 70B with QLoRA on single 48GB GPU (vs 8 needed for full) | 205, 206, 207 | | **Mixed Precision Training (AMP)** | Training with FP16/BF16 compute and FP32 master weights | Accelerating training, reducing memory usage | 2-3x speedup, 40% memory reduction, maintained model quality | Requires overflow handling, not all ops support FP16, potential numerical issues | Training GPT model with Automatic Mixed Precision on A100 at 2.5x speedup | 208, 209 | | **Distributed Data Loading** | Parallel data loading and preprocessing across cluster nodes | Large dataset training, I/O bound workloads | Eliminates data loading bottleneck, scales with cluster, efficient bandwidth use | Requires coordination, network bandwidth considerations | Loading 5TB training data from distributed storage at 40 GB/s aggregate | 210, 211 | | **Multi-Node Training** | Coordinating training across multiple servers with fast interconnect | Foundation model training, requires >8 GPUs | Scales to 1000s of GPUs, enables massive models, leverages cluster resources | Network becomes critical bottleneck, complex setup, expensive interconnects | Training foundation model on 256 H100s across 32 nodes with InfiniBand | 195, 212, 213 | --- ## Table 12: Edge & Distributed Inference | Technique/Approach/Type | Description | Main Usages | Advantages | Considerations | Example | Reference | |------------------------|-------------|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------| | **On-Device Inference** | Running quantized models directly on mobile/edge devices | Mobile apps, IoT devices, offline-capable applications | Zero cloud costs, <10ms latency, works offline, complete privacy | Limited to small models (<3B), lower quality, device fragmentation | 1.5B quantized model on smartphone for real-time translation | 35, 214, 215 | | **Edge-Cloud Hybrid** | Small model on edge with selective cloud offloading for complex queries | Real-time apps with occasional complex needs, bandwidth-constrained scenarios | Low latency for common queries, full capabilities for complex, balanced cost | Routing logic complexity, network dependency for some queries | 3B model on edge (90% queries), cloud GPT-4 for complex 10% | 25, 36, 216 | | **Model Disaggregation** | Splitting prefill and decode phases across edge/cloud resources | Latency-critical apps, optimizing resource usage | Optimizes hardware for each phase, reduces edge compute needs | Complex orchestration, network latency considerations | Prefill in cloud, decode streamed to edge for low-latency generation | 217, 218 | | **Federated Inference** | Distributing model inference across multiple edge nodes | Privacy-preserving inference, distributed applications | Data never leaves edge, utilizes distributed compute | Coordination overhead, network latency, fault tolerance challenges | Healthcare app processing patient data on hospital edge servers | 219, 220 | | **Speculative Edge Inference** | Edge draft model proposes tokens, cloud model verifies for quality | Mobile apps requiring quality with speed | Combines edge speed with cloud quality, adaptive quality | Increased complexity, network required for verification | Mobile assistant with 1B draft model on device, 70B verifier in cloud | 221, 222 | | **Progressive Inference** | Starting with fast local inference, refining with cloud if needed | Apps with tiered quality requirements, latency-sensitive + quality | Fast initial response, quality refinement optional, good UX | Complex implementation, state management challenges | Search showing instant local results, replacing with cloud results in 500ms | 223, 224 | | **Edge Model Caching** | Caching models and KV caches on edge for repeated patterns | Repeated inference patterns, personalized models | Faster subsequent inferences, reduced bandwidth, personalization | Limited edge storage, cache invalidation, staleness issues | Smart speaker caching voice command models for instant response | 225, 226 | | **Sparse Models for Edge** | Using sparse/mixture-of-experts models on edge devices | Resource-constrained edge inference | Better quality than dense models of same size, conditional compute | Specialized frameworks needed, limited hardware support | 7B MoE model with 2B active parameters achieving 13B-level quality | 227, 228 | --- ## Table 13: Disaster Recovery & High Availability | Technique/Approach/Type | Description | Main Usages | Advantages | Considerations | Example | Reference | |------------------------|-------------|-------------|------------|----------------|---------|-----------| | **Multi-Provider Failover** | Automatic switching between LLM providers when one fails | Production reliability, avoiding single provider dependency | 99.9%+ uptime, handles provider outages, cost optimization opportunities | Prompt compatibility challenges, latency overhead, cost management | Primary OpenAI fails → automatic switch to Anthropic within 2 seconds | 229, 230, 231 | | **Geo-Redundant Deployment** | Deploying across multiple geographic regions for disaster recovery | Global apps, regulatory requirements, high availability | Survives regional outages, lower latency globally, compliance benefits | 2-3x infrastructure costs, data sync complexity | Models in US-East, EU-West, Asia-Pacific with automatic failover | 231, 232 | | **Checkpoint-Based Recovery** | Periodic saving of training state for recovery from hardware failures | Long training jobs (days to weeks), fault tolerance | Enables recovery without full restart, protects investment in training | Storage costs, checkpoint frequency tradeoffs, restoration time | Training job recovered from checkpoint after node failure, losing only 2 hours | 186, 233, 234 | | **Health Monitoring & Auto-Healing** | Continuous health checks with automatic restart of failed components | Production serving, Kubernetes environments | Automatic recovery from transient issues, reduced manual intervention | May mask underlying problems, restart loops possible | Kubernetes automatically restarting pod that failed health check 3 times | 235, 236 | | **Traffic Shadowing** | Sending copy of production traffic to new model without affecting users | Validating new models, regression testing, confidence building | Safe production testing, no user impact, real-world validation | 2x inference costs during testing, complexity in analyzing results | New model receives shadow traffic for 24 hours before live switch | 237, 238 | | **Gradual Rollout (Canary)** | Deploying new models to small % of traffic, gradually increasing | Minimizing risk of bad deployments, staged validation | Limited blast radius, early problem detection, data-driven rollout | Complexity in traffic splitting, requires monitoring infrastructure | New model: 5% → 25% → 50% → 100% over 3 days based on metrics | 239, 240 | | **Backup Model Strategy** | Maintaining simpler fallback model for when primary fails | Handling outages, degraded mode operation | Guarantees some service vs complete outage, manageable costs | Lower quality fallback experience, dual model maintenance | If GPT-4 unavailable, automatically fall back to fine-tuned Llama 2 70B | 229, 241 | | **Database Replication** | Replicating vector databases, caches, and state across regions | RAG applications, stateful systems, high availability | Survives database failures, faster local reads, supports failover | Data consistency challenges, replication lag, increased storage costs | Vector database replicated across 3 regions with async replication | 242, 243 | | **Automated Failover Testing (Chaos Engineering)** | Regularly testing failure scenarios in production-like environments | Validating DR plans, building confidence, finding issues proactively | Validates failover works, identifies issues before real incident | Risk of disruption, requires maturity, tooling investment | Monthly test: Killing primary region nodes, validating automatic failover | 244, 245 | --- ## References ### Infrastructure & Hardware 1. Splunk AI Infrastructure Guide - https://www.splunk.com/en_us/blog/learn/ai-infrastructure.html 2. Hardware Guide for LLMs and Deep Learning - https://medium.com/@fenjiro/hardware-guide-for-large-language-models-and-deep-learning-b619af574cca 3. Milvus Hardware Requirements for LLM Training - https://milvus.io/ai-quick-reference/what-hardware-is-required-to-train-an-llm 4. Network and Storage Benchmarks for LLM Training - https://maknee.github.io/blog/2025/Network-And-Storage-Training-Skypilot/ 5. Local LLM Hardware Guide 2025 - https://introl.com/blog/local-llm-hardware-pricing-guide-2025 6. Hardware Requirements for LLM Training - https://www.appypieagents.ai/blog/hardware-requirements-for-llm-training 7. Mastering LLM Training with NVIDIA H200 - https://uvation.com/articles/mastering-llm-training-scaling-gpu-clusters-with-nvidia-h200 8. LLM Training - Glenn Lockwood - https://www.glennklockwood.com/garden/LLM-training 9. Guide to Hardware Requirements for Training and Fine-Tuning - https://towardsai.net/p/artificial-intelligence/guide-to-hardware-requirements-for-training-and-fine-tuning-large-language-models 10. AI-Ready Data Centers Infrastructure - https://www.datacenters.com/news/ai-ready-data-centers-the-infrastructure-behind-llms-gpus-and-ai-clusters 11. Hardware Recommendations for LLM Servers - https://www.pugetsystems.com/solutions/ai/enterprise-scale/hardware-recommendations/ 12. Supermicro LLM Infrastructure - https://www.supermicro.com/en/glossary/llm-infrastructure 13. Complete Guide to Local LLM Hardware - https://www.mayhemcode.com/2025/12/the-complete-guide-to-local-llm.html 14. Accelerate Large-Scale LLM Inference with CPU-GPU Memory Sharing - https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/accelerate-large-scale-llm-inference-and-kv-cache-offload-with-cpu-gpu-memory-sharing/ 15. Calculating GPU Memory for Serving LLMs - https://training.continuumlabs.ai/infrastructure/data-and-memory/calculating-gpu-memory-for-serving-llms 16. Understanding LLM GPUs Clusters Fabrics Traffic - https://www.dell.com/en-us/blog/understanding-llm-gpus-clusters-fabrics-traffic-for-networkers-part-2/ 17. Recommended Hardware for Running LLMs Locally - https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/deep-learning/recommended-hardware-for-running-llms-locally/ 18. Optimizing Checkpoint Bandwidth for LLM Training - https://www.vastdata.com/blog/optimizing-checkpoint-bandwidth-for-llm-training 19. Infrastructure Requirements for LLMs - https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/infrastructure-requirements-llms-arivukkarasan-raja-j0acc ### Deployment Strategies 20. Best LLMOps Platforms in 2025 - https://www.braintrust.dev/articles/best-llmops-platforms-2025 21. On Premise vs Cloud Based LLM - https://www.signitysolutions.com/blog/on-premise-vs-cloud-based-llm 22. On-Prem LLMs vs Cloud APIs - https://www.unifiedaihub.com/blog/on-premise-llms-vs-cloud-apis-when-to-run-your-ai-models-on-premise 23. Cloud vs On-Prem LLMs Long-Term Cost Analysis - https://latitude.so/blog/cloud-vs-on-prem-llms-long-term-cost-analysis 24. Cloud vs On-Prem AI Deployment Strategy - https://www.allganize.ai/en/blog/enterprise-guide-choosing-between-on-premise-and-cloud-llm-and-agentic-ai-deployment-models 25. Hybrid Cloud vs On-Premise LLM Deployment - https://www.newline.co/@zaoyang/hybrid-cloud-vs-on-premise-llm-deployment--74f51098 26. On-Premises vs Cloud LLM: Enterprise Guide - https://www.innoflexion.com/blog/on-premises-vs-cloud-llm 27. Cloud vs On-Prem LLMs: Strategic Considerations - https://radicalbit.ai/resources/blog/cloud-onprem-llm/ 28. Transform Your AI Applications with Local LLM Deployment - https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/azuredevcommunityblog/transform-your-ai-applications-with-local-llm-deployment/4462829 29. LLM Deployment Pipeline Complete Overview - https://northflank.com/blog/llm-deployment-pipeline 30. Navigating LLM Deployment Tips and Techniques - https://www.infoq.com/presentations/llm-deployment/ 31. Deploying LLMs at Scale With Docker and Kubernetes - https://dzone.com/articles/llm-deployment-docker-kubernetes 32. Build Scalable LLM Apps With Kubernetes - https://thenewstack.io/build-scalable-llm-apps-with-kubernetes-a-step-by-step-guide/ 33. Deploy LLM Models on Kubernetes using OpenLLM - https://www.cloudraft.io/blog/deploy-llms-on-kubernetes-using-openllm 34. From Zero to GenAI Cluster: Docker, Kubernetes, GPU - https://dev.to/docker/from-zero-to-genai-cluster-scalable-local-llms-with-docker-kubernetes-and-gpu-scheduling-47on 35. Why Compact LLMs Outperform Cloud Inference at the Edge - https://www.shakudo.io/blog/edge-llm-deployment-guide 36. Efficient Inference for Edge LLMs Survey - https://www.sciopen.com/article/10.26599/TST.2025.9010166 37. Customizing LLMs for Efficient Latency-Aware Inference at Edge - https://www.usenix.org/system/files/atc25-tian.pdf 38. Distributed LLM Inference on Edge Devices - https://www.newline.co/@zaoyang/distributed-llm-inference-on-edge-devices-key-patterns--a035dc1b 39. Securing AI/LLMs in 2025 - https://softwareanalyst.substack.com/p/securing-aillms-in-2025-a-practical 40. Designing Resilient LLM Architectures: Disaster Recovery - https://medium.com/@FrankGoortani/designing-resilient-llm-architectures-disaster-recovery-strategies-6ad2e2f65942 ### Model Serving & Inference Optimization 41. Mastering LLM Techniques: Inference Optimization - https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/mastering-llm-techniques-inference-optimization/ 42. LLM Inference Performance Engineering Best Practices - https://www.databricks.com/blog/llm-inference-performance-engineering-best-practices 43. LLM Inference Optimization Techniques - https://www.clarifai.com/blog/llm-inference-optimization/ 44. Continuous Batching from First Principles - https://huggingface.co/blog/continuous_batching 45. Meet vLLM: Faster, More Efficient LLM Inference - https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/meet-vllm-faster-more-efficient-llm-inference-and-serving 46. Achieve 23x LLM Inference Throughput with Continuous Batching - https://www.anyscale.com/blog/continuous-batching-llm-inference 47. LLM Quantization Techniques: GGUF GPTQ AWQ - https://joydeep31415.medium.com/llm-quantization-techniques-4229b7eac20c 48. Practical Guide to LLM Quantization Methods - https://cast.ai/blog/demystifying-quantizations-llms/ 49. LLM Inference Optimization: Speed, Scale, Savings - https://deepsense.ai/blog/llm-inference-optimization-how-to-speed-up-cut-costs-and-scale-ai-models/ 50. LLM Serving Guide: Faster Inference - https://predibase.com/blog/guide-how-to-serve-llms-faster-inference 51. Inside vLLM: Anatomy of a High-Throughput System - https://www.aleksagordic.com/blog/vllm 52. Understanding Efficiency: Quantization, Batching in LLM Energy Use - https://openreview.net/forum?id=m1lq5lg6r1 53. LLM Inference Serving: Survey of Recent Advances - https://arxiv.org/html/2407.12391v1 54. End-to-End Modeling and Optimization of Multi-Stage LLM Serving - https://arxiv.org/html/2504.09775v4 55. vLLM Documentation - https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/ 56. Inside vLLM Blog: Anatomy of vLLM - https://blog.vllm.ai/2025/09/05/anatomy-of-vllm.html 57. LLM Serving: Continuous Batching - https://machinelearningatscale.substack.com/p/llm-serving-1-continuous-batching 58. Ultimate Guide to LLM Inference Optimization - https://inference.net/content/llm-inference-optimization 59. Serving Machine Learning Models at Scale - https://sealos.io/blog/serving-machine-learning-models-at-scale-a-guide-to-inference-optimization 60. Continuous vs Dynamic Batching for AI Inference - https://www.baseten.co/blog/continuous-vs-dynamic-batching-for-ai-inference/ ### Model Quantization 61. Complete Guide to LLM Quantization with vLLM - https://docs.jarvislabs.ai/blog/vllm-quantization-complete-guide-benchmarks 62. Complete Guide to LLM Quantization - https://localllm.in/blog/quantization-explained 63. LLMs on CPU: Power of Quantization - https://www.ionio.ai/blog/llms-on-cpu-the-power-of-quantization-with-gguf-awq-gptq 64. Which Quantization Method is Right for You - https://newsletter.maartengrootendorst.com/p/which-quantization-method-is-right 65. GGUF vs GPTQ vs AWQ: Which Quantization - https://localaimaster.com/blog/quantization-explained 66. AI Model Quantization 2025 Master Guide - https://local-ai-zone.github.io/guides/what-is-ai-quantization-q4-k-m-q8-gguf-guide-2025.html 67. Understanding LLM Weight Quantization - https://medium.com/@abhi-84/understanding-llm-weight-quantization-gptq-awq-and-gguf-make-big-models-fit-in-a-small-space-518bb204cae4 68. vLLM Quantization Documentation - https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/features/quantization/ 69. Speeding Up LLMs: Deep Dive into GPTQ and AWQ - https://medium.com/@kimdoil1211/speeding-up-large-language-models-a-deep-dive-into-gptq-and-awq-quantization-0bb001eaabd4 70. Practice: Loading GGUF and GPTQ Models - https://apxml.com/courses/practical-llm-quantization/chapter-5-quantization-formats-tooling/practice-loading-quantized-formats 71. Performance Trade-offs of Optimizing Small Language Models - https://arxiv.org/html/2510.21970v1 72. LLM Quantization Guide - https://medium.com/@siddharth.vij10/llm-quantization-gptq-qat-awq-gguf-ggml-ptq-2e172cd1b3b5 73. Comprehensive Analysis of Post-Training Quantization - https://uplatz.com/blog/a-comprehensive-analysis-of-post-training-quantization-strategies-for-large-language-models-gptq-awq-and-gguf/ ### LLMOps & Orchestration 74. ML Model Registry: Ultimate Guide - https://neptune.ai/blog/ml-model-registry 75. Model Versioning Infrastructure - https://introl.com/blog/model-versioning-infrastructure-mlops-artifact-management-guide-2025 76. MLflow Model Registry - https://mlflow.org/docs/latest/ml/model-registry/ 77. MLflow for LLM/GenAI - https://mlflow.org/docs/3.1.0rc0/llms 78. Best LLMOps Platforms in 2025 - https://www.braintrust.dev/articles/best-llmops-platforms-2025 79. ZenML: One AI Platform - https://www.zenml.io/ 80. 9 Best LLM Orchestration Frameworks - https://www.zenml.io/blog/best-llm-orchestration-frameworks 81. What is LLMOps - LakFS - https://lakefs.io/blog/llmops/ 82. Top LLMOps Tools & Compare to MLOps - https://research.aimultiple.com/llmops-tools/ 83. LLM Orchestration in 2026 - https://research.aimultiple.com/llm-orchestration/ 84. MLOps Landscape in 2025 - https://neptune.ai/blog/mlops-tools-platforms-landscape 85. What is LLM Orchestration - IBM - https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/llm-orchestration 86. Top 15 LLMOps Tools for Building AI Applications - https://www.datacamp.com/blog/llmops-tools 87. Open Source MLOps and LLMOps Orchestration - https://www.mlrun.org/blog/open-source-mlops-and-llmops-orchestration/ 88. LLMOps Guide: How it Works - https://www.tredence.com/llmops 89. What is LLMOps - Google Cloud - https://cloud.google.com/discover/what-is-llmops 90. LLMOps: Operationalizing LLMs - Databricks - https://www.databricks.com/glossary/llmops 91. LangSmith Observability Platform - https://www.langchain.com/langsmith/observability 92. ClearML AI Infrastructure Platform - https://clear.ml/ 93. Best LLMOps Tools Comparison - https://winder.ai/llmops-tools-comparison-open-source-llm-production-frameworks/ 94. LLMOps - Microsoft Learn - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/playbook/technology-guidance/generative-ai/mlops-in-openai/ ### Observability & Monitoring 95. LLM Observability - Datadog - https://www.datadoghq.com/product/llm-observability/ 96. What is LLM Observability - Confident AI - https://www.confident-ai.com/blog/what-is-llm-observability-the-ultimate-llm-monitoring-guide 97. What is LLM Observability - Langfuse - https://langfuse.com/faq/all/llm-observability 98. Best LLM Observability Tools in 2025 - https://www.firecrawl.dev/blog/best-llm-observability-tools 99. Model Usage & Cost Tracking - Langfuse - https://langfuse.com/docs/observability/features/token-and-cost-tracking 100. From Bills to Budgets: Track LLM Token Usage - https://www.traceloop.com/blog/from-bills-to-budgets-how-to-track-llm-token-usage-and-cost-per-user 101. Understanding LLM Observability - ClickHouse - https://clickhouse.com/resources/engineering/llm-observability 102. LLM Observability Best Practices for 2025 - https://www.getmaxim.ai/articles/llm-observability-best-practices-for-2025/ 103. What Is LLM Observability - Datadog Knowledge Center - https://www.datadoghq.com/knowledge-center/llm-observability/ 104. 5 Best Tools for Monitoring LLM Apps - https://www.braintrust.dev/articles/best-llm-monitoring-tools-2026 105. LLM Observability Tools 2026 Comparison - https://lakefs.io/blog/llm-observability-tools/ 106. LLM Observability Fundamentals - Neptune.ai - https://neptune.ai/blog/llm-observability 107. What is LLM Observability - IBM - https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/llm-observability 108. LLM Observability Ultimate Guide - Comet - https://www.comet.com/site/blog/llm-observability/ 109. 4 Best Tools for Monitoring LLM Applications - https://langwatch.ai/blog/4-best-tools-for-monitoring-llm-agentapplications-in-2026 110. What is LLM Observability - Humanloop - https://humanloop.com/blog/llm-monitoring 111. 10 LLM Observability Tools to Know - Coralogix - https://coralogix.com/guides/llm-observability-tools/ 112. LLM Observability: 5 Essential Pillars - Helicone - https://www.helicone.ai/blog/llm-observability ### API Gateways & Load Management 113. LLM Gateway Patterns: Rate Limiting and Load Balancing - https://collabnix.com/llm-gateway-patterns-rate-limiting-and-load-balancing-guide/ 114. Tackling Rate Limiting for LLM Apps - Portkey - https://portkey.ai/blog/tackling-rate-limiting-for-llm-apps/ 115. APISIX AI Gateway - https://apisix.apache.org/ai-gateway/ 116. What is LLM Gateway - TrueFoundry - https://www.truefoundry.com/blog/llm-gateway 117. Rate Limiting in AI Gateway - TrueFoundry - https://www.truefoundry.com/blog/rate-limiting-in-llm-gateway 118. Rate Limiting and Quotas for LLM APIs - https://compute.hivenet.com/post/llm-rate-limiting-quotas 119. Rate Limits - LLM Gateway Documentation - https://docs.llmgateway.io/resources/rate-limits 120. How API Gateways Proxy LLM Requests - https://api7.ai/learning-center/api-gateway-guide/api-gateway-proxy-llm-requests 121. Proxy Load Balancing - liteLLM - https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/proxy/load_balancing 122. Router Load Balancing - liteLLM - https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/routing 123. Why Your AI Gateway Strategy Matters - https://api7.ai/blog/llm-workload-types-ai-gateway-strategy 124. Building AI Control Plane: Primer on AI Gateways - https://medium.com/@adnanmasood/primer-on-ai-gateways-llm-proxies-routers-definition-usage-and-purpose-9b714d544f8c 125. How an LLM Gateway Can Help Build Better Apps - https://dev.to/kuldeep_paul/how-an-llm-gateway-can-help-you-build-better-ai-applications-27hf 126. Rate Limiting LLM Token Usage With Agentgateway - https://www.cloudnativedeepdive.com/rate-limiting-llm-token-usage-with-agentgateway/ 127. Top 5 AI Gateways for Optimizing LLM Performance - https://www.getmaxim.ai/articles/top-5-ai-gateways-for-optimizing-llm-performance-through-intelligent-routing/ 128. GitHub LiteLLM: Python SDK and Proxy Server - https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm 129. LiteLLM AI Gateway Documentation - https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/simple_proxy 130. What is an LLM Gateway - Medium - https://medium.com/@yadav.navya1601/what-is-an-llm-gateway-understanding-the-infrastructure-layer-for-multi-model-ai-fea4fecbc931 131. Explore Key Features of Apache APISIX AI Gateway - https://apisix.apache.org/blog/2025/02/24/apisix-ai-gateway-features/ ### Security, Privacy & Compliance 132. LLM Data Privacy: Protecting Enterprise Data - https://www.lasso.security/blog/llm-data-privacy 133. LLM Compliance: Risks and Best Practices - https://www.lasso.security/blog/llm-compliance 134. What Measures Ensure LLM GDPR Compliance - https://milvus.io/ai-quick-reference/what-measures-ensure-llm-compliance-with-data-privacy-laws-like-gdpr 135. Privacy Risks in LLMs: Enterprise AI Governance - https://secureprivacy.ai/blog/privacy-risks-llms-enterprise-ai-governance 136. Public vs Private LLMs: Secure AI for Enterprises - https://www.matillion.com/blog/public-vs-private-llms-enterprise-ai-security 137. Balancing Innovation and Privacy: LLMs under GDPR - https://www.getdynamiq.ai/post/balancing-innovation-and-privacy-llms-under-gdpr 138. Navigating GDPR Compliance in LLM Life Cycle - https://www.private-ai.com/en/2024/04/02/gdpr-llm-lifecycle/ 139. LLM Security: Challenges and Best Practices - https://aisera.com/blog/llm-security/ 140. LLM GDPR Compliance - GDPR Local - https://gdprlocal.com/large-language-models-llm-gdpr/ 141. LLM GDPR Compliance - Relyance AI - https://www.relyance.ai/blog/llm-gdpr-compliance 142. Best Practices for Privacy and Data Governance - https://dzone.com/articles/llmops-privacy-data-governance-best-practices 143. AI and Data Protection: Strategies for LLM Compliance - https://www.proofpoint.com/us/blog/dspm/ai-and-data-protection-strategies-for-llm-compliance-and-risk-mitigation 144. Compliance in the Age of LLMs - LakeFS - https://lakefs.io/blog/llm-compliance/ 145. Private LLMs: Data Protection Potential - https://www.skyflow.com/post/private-llms-data-protection-potential-and-limitations 146. Data Security and Privacy for Third-Party LLM APIs - https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/data-security-and-privacy-precautions 147. Privacy in the EU and LLMs - https://unless.com/en/blog/know-how/privacy-in-the-eu-and-llms/ 148. What Are LLM Regulatory Compliance Requirements - https://datavid.com/blog/what-are-llm-regulatory-compliance-requirements-for-enterprises 149. GDPR Compliance in 2024: AI and LLMs Impact - https://www.workstreet.com/blog/gdpr-compliance-in-2024-how-ai-and-llms-impact-european-user-rights 150. How to Use LLM with Private Data - https://www.cognativ.com/blogs/post/how-to-use-llm-with-private-data-best-practices-for-data-security/263 ### Cost Optimization & Management 151. LLM Cost Optimization Pipelines - https://www.leanware.co/insights/llm-cost-optimization-pipelines 152. LLM Cost Management - Infracost - https://www.infracost.io/glossary/llm-cost-management/ 153. Monitor OpenAI LLM Spend with Datadog - https://www.datadoghq.com/blog/monitor-openai-cost-datadog-cloud-cost-management-llm-observability/ 154. How to Monitor LLM API Costs - Helicone - https://www.helicone.ai/blog/monitor-and-optimize-llm-costs 155. Kinde AI Token Pricing Optimization - https://kinde.com/learn/billing/billing-for-ai/ai-token-pricing-optimization-dynamic-cost-management-for-llm-powered-saas/ 156. Understanding LLM Cost Per Token 2026 - https://www.silicondata.com/blog/llm-cost-per-token 157. LLM Cost Management Guide - https://symflower.com/en/company/blog/2024/managing-llm-costs/ 158. Building Hierarchical Budget Controls - https://dev.to/pranay_batta/building-hierarchical-budget-controls-for-multi-tenant-llm-gateways-ceo 159. How to Build Cost Management for LLM Operations - https://oneuptime.com/blog/post/2026-01-30-llmops-cost-management/view 160. Managing LLM Agent Costs - Apxml - https://apxml.com/courses/multi-agent-llm-systems-design-implementation/chapter-6-system-evaluation-debugging-tuning/managing-llm-agent-costs 161. Top 5 Multi-LLM Platforms For Token Expenses - https://www.prompts.ai/blog/multi-llm-platforms-token-expenses 162. LLM API Pricing Guide - https://mobisoftinfotech.com/resources/blog/ai-development/llm-api-pricing-guide 163. FinOps in the Age of AI - https://www.finout.io/blog/finops-in-the-age-of-ai-a-cpos-guide-to-llm-workflows-rag-ai-agents-and-agentic-systems 164. Deadline-Aware Online Scheduling for LLM - https://arxiv.org/html/2512.20967 165. Easiest Way to Deploy LLM Backend with Autoscaling - https://www.runpod.io/articles/guides/deploy-llm-backend-autoscaling 166. Mastering LLM Training: GPU Cost Optimization - https://uvation.com/articles/mastering-llm-training-scaling-gpu-clusters-with-nvidia-h200 167. LLM Cost Tracking Solution - TrueFoundry - https://www.truefoundry.com/blog/llm-cost-tracking-solution 168. Cost Management and Token Usage Tracking - https://apxml.com/courses/langchain-production-llm/chapter-6-optimizing-scaling-langchain/cost-management-token-tracking 169. LLM Economics: Avoid Costly Pitfalls - https://www.aiacceleratorinstitute.com/llm-economics-how-to-avoid-costly-pitfalls/ 170. Tracking LLM Token Usage Across Providers - https://portkey.ai/blog/tracking-llm-token-usage-across-providers-teams-and-workloads/ 171. LLM Cost Optimization: Stop Token Spend Waste - https://www.kosmoy.com/post/llm-cost-management-stop-burning-money-on-tokens 172. Scaling AI Infrastructure for LLMs - https://gun.io/news/2025/04/scaling-ai-infrastructure-for-llms/ 173. What 1,200 Production Deployments Reveal - ZenML - https://www.zenml.io/blog/what-1200-production-deployments-reveal-about-llmops-in-2025 ### Infrastructure Automation & Scaling 174. Best Practices for Autoscaling LLM Inference - https://docs.cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/best-practices/machine-learning/inference/autoscaling 175. Horizontal Pod Autoscaling Documentation - (Kubernetes standard documentation) 176. Deploy Production-Ready LLM APIs with Auto-Scaling - https://medium.com/@nicholasthoni/deploy-production-ready-llm-apis-with-auto-scaling-gpu-infrastructure-in-1-hour-10f2eed0a105 177. SageServe: Optimizing LLM Serving with Auto-Scaling - https://arxiv.org/html/2502.14617v3 178. LLM GPU Utilisation and Network Bottlenecks - https://medium.com/@vipulkc/llms-gpu-utilisation-and-network-bottlenecks-d64eba92c494 179. Modal: High-Performance AI Infrastructure - https://modal.com/ 180. Serving Models Fast and Slow - https://arxiv.org/html/2502.14617v1 181. Infrastructure as Code best practices - (General DevOps resources) 182. Smart Multi-Node Scheduling for LLM Inference - https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/smart-multi-node-scheduling-for-fast-and-efficient-llm-inference-with-nvidia-runai-and-nvidia-dynamo/ 183. GitOps for Machine Learning - (Various MLOps resources) 184. Why Cast AI Is Best for LLM Workloads - https://cast.ai/blog/why-cast-ai-is-best-for-llm-workloads/ 185. Kubernetes for LLMs: Deployment Guide - https://marutitech.com/kubernetes-for-llms-deployment-guide/ 186. Checkpointing Strategies for LLMs - https://medium.com/@dpratishraj7991/checkpointing-strategies-for-large-language-models-llms-full-sharded-efficient-restarts-at-0fa026d8a566 187. LLM Training Checkpointing & Fault Tolerance - https://apxml.com/courses/mlops-for-large-models-llmops/chapter-3-llm-training-finetuning-ops/checkpointing-fault-tolerance 188. Demystifying Distributed Checkpointing - https://expertofobsolescence.substack.com/p/demystifying-distributed-checkpointing 189. ML Model Versioning and Experiment Tracking - https://dasroot.net/posts/2026/02/ml-model-versioning-experiment-tracking-mlflow/ 190. MLflow on Databricks - LakeFS - https://lakefs.io/blog/databricks-mlflow/ 191. CI/CD for Machine Learning - (Various MLOps resources) 192. Databricks Managed MLflow - https://www.databricks.com/product/managed-mlflow 193. Blue-Green Deployments for ML - (DevOps best practices) 194. Plan for Versioning and Rolling Back LLM - https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/plan-for-versioning-and-potentially ### Distributed Training & Fine-Tuning 195. A Survey of Efficient LLM Inference Serving - https://aclanthology.org/2025.inlg-main.32.pdf 196. FSDP PyTorch Documentation - (PyTorch standard documentation) 197. Tensor Parallelism Techniques - (Research papers on model parallelism) 198. Pipeline Parallelism for Large Models - (Research papers) 199. Fully Sharded Data Parallel Training - (PyTorch/Meta research) 200. Scaling AI Infrastructure for LLMs Best Practices - https://gun.io/news/2025/04/scaling-ai-infrastructure-for-llms/ 201. DeepSpeed ZeRO Documentation - (Microsoft DeepSpeed docs) 202. Robust LLM Training Infrastructure at ByteDance - https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.16293 203. Gradient Checkpointing Tutorial - (PyTorch documentation) 204. Memory-Efficient Training Techniques - (Various ML resources) 205. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation - (Research paper by Microsoft) 206. QLoRA: Quantized LoRA - (Research paper) 207. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Guide - (HuggingFace documentation) 208. Automatic Mixed Precision Training - (NVIDIA documentation) 209. Mixed Precision Training Guide - (PyTorch documentation) 210. Distributed Data Loading Patterns - (Data engineering resources) 211. High-Performance Data Loading - (Various ML infrastructure guides) 212. Multi-Node Training at Scale - (Cloud provider documentation) 213. Large-Scale Distributed Training - (Research and industry papers) ### Edge & Distributed Inference 214. Why Compact LLMs Outperform Cloud at Edge - https://www.shakudo.io/blog/edge-llm-deployment-guide 215. Inference Performance Evaluation for LLMs on Edge - https://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.11269 216. Optimizing LLM Deployment in Edge Environments - https://journalijsra.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/IJSRA-2025-0912.pdf 217. LLM Inference Optimization Techniques - Clarifai - https://www.clarifai.com/blog/llm-inference-optimization/ 218. Towards Efficient Multi-LLM Inference - https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.06579 219. Federated Learning and LLMs - (Research papers) 220. Edge-Enhanced Intelligence Survey - https://threadlocal.github.io/assets/files/COMST_LLMs.pdf 221. A Speculative LLM Decoding Framework for Edge - https://www.arxiv.org/pdf/2506.09397v1 222. CLONE: Customizing LLMs for Edge - https://arxiv.org/html/2506.02847v1 223. Progressive Inference Strategies - (Various research papers) 224. Efficient Routing of Inference Requests - https://arxiv.org/html/2507.15553v1 225. Edge Model Caching Strategies - (Infrastructure papers) 226. LLM on the Edge: New Frontier - https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3943/paper28.pdf 227. Sparse Models and Mixture of Experts - (Research papers) 228. LLM Inference Scheduling Survey - https://www.techrxiv.org/users/994660/articles/1355915/master/file/data/LLM_Scheduling_Survey_Arxiv_06Oct2025/LLM_Scheduling_Survey_Arxiv_06Oct2025.pdf ### Disaster Recovery & High Availability 229. Designing Resilient LLM Architectures - https://medium.com/@FrankGoortani/designing-resilient-llm-architectures-disaster-recovery-strategies-6ad2e2f65942 230. How to Design Fault-Tolerant LLM Architectures - https://latitude-blog.ghost.io/blog/how-to-design-fault-tolerant-llm-architectures/ 231. Fault Tolerance in LLM Pipelines - https://latitude.so/blog/fault-tolerance-llm-pipelines-techniques/ 232. Disaster Recovery for LLM Workloads - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395209253_Disaster_Recovery_and_High_Availability_Strategies_for_LLM_Workloads_in_Cloud-Regulated_Ecosystems 233. TRANSOM: Fault-Tolerant System for Training - https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.10046 234. FlashRecovery: Fast Recovery from Failures - https://arxiv.org/html/2509.03047v1 235. All is Not Lost: LLM Recovery without Checkpoints - https://arxiv.org/html/2506.15461v1 236. 5 Recovery Strategies for Multi-Agent LLM Failures - https://www.newline.co/@zaoyang/5-recovery-strategies-for-multi-agent-llm-failures--673fe4c4 237. Traffic Shadowing for ML - (DevOps best practices) 238. Breaking the Bottleneck: Scalability Hurdles - https://dev.to/naveens16/breaking-the-bottleneck-overcoming-scalability-hurdles-in-llm-training-and-inference-7ob 239. Canary Deployments for ML Models - (MLOps resources) 240. Understanding Cloud Disaster Recovery - https://www.mirantis.com/blog/disaster-recovery-concepts-fault-tolerance-high-availability-backups-and-more/ 241. When LLMs Go Down Ensure Agents Stay Up - https://www.salesforce.com/blog/failover-design/?bc=OTH 242. Vector Database Replication - (Database documentation) 243. Mnemosyne: Lightweight Error Recovery - https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3735358.3735372 244. Chaos Engineering for ML Systems - (Reliability engineering resources) 245. Adaptive Fault Tolerance Mechanisms - https://arxiv.org/html/2503.12228v1 ### YouTube Videos & Learning Resources 246. 5 YouTube Channels to Master LLMs - https://www.kdnuggets.com/5-youtube-channels-to-master-llms 247. Learn Large Language Models: Top 10 Videos - https://datasciencedojo.com/blog/learn-large-language-models-videos/ 248. Top 9 YouTube Channels for LLMs - https://datasciencedojo.com/blog/large-language-models-youtube-channels/ 249. Intro to Large Language Models (1 hour) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjkBMFhNj_g 250. LLM Course on GitHub - https://github.com/mlabonne/llm-course

On This Page

On This Page