# Data Collection Techniques for Custom Applications with Generative AI/LLM Component Data collection is a foundational step in developing custom applications with Generative AI and Large Language Model (LLM) components. The quality, diversity, and relevance of collected data directly impact the performance, accuracy, and reliability of AI systems. Whether building RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) applications, fine-tuning models for specific domains, or implementing RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback), selecting appropriate data collection techniques is crucial. These techniques range from automated web scraping and synthetic data generation to manual annotation and real-time user interaction logging. Each method serves different purposes—from pre-training and fine-tuning to continuous improvement and alignment with human preferences. Understanding when and how to apply these techniques enables developers to create robust, context-aware, and ethically aligned AI applications. | **Technique** | **Description** | **Main Usages** | **Advantages** | **Considerations** | **Example** | |---------------|-----------------|-----------------|----------------|-------------------|-------------| | **Web Scraping** | Automated extraction of content from websites, APIs, and online repositories using specialized tools and frameworks to collect large-scale text data | • Pre-training data collection
• Domain-specific corpus building
• RAG knowledge base construction
• Real-time data updates for dynamic applications | • Access to vast, diverse data sources
• Cost-effective at scale
• Up-to-date information retrieval
• Automated and scalable process | • Legal and ethical compliance (robots.txt, terms of service)
• Data quality and noise filtering
• Rate limiting and API restrictions
• Need for data cleaning and preprocessing | Using BeautifulSoup or Firecrawl to scrape technical documentation from multiple developer sites, converting HTML to Markdown format for LLM training | | **Synthetic Data Generation** | Creating artificial training data using existing LLMs or generative models to simulate realistic scenarios, conversations, and datasets | • Data augmentation for small datasets
• Generating edge cases and rare scenarios
• Creating privacy-compliant training data
• Instruction dataset generation | • Addresses data scarcity issues
• Cost-effective alternative to manual labeling
• Privacy-preserving (no real user data)
• Controllable data characteristics | • May lack real-world diversity
• Risk of amplifying model biases
• Quality depends on generation model
• Requires validation against real data | Using GPT-4 to generate question-answer pairs from technical documents, or using paraphrasing and back-translation to augment training datasets | | **Human Feedback & RLHF** | Collecting human preferences and evaluations through crowdsourcing platforms where annotators rank, score, or critique model outputs | • Model alignment and safety tuning
• Preference learning for response quality
• Bias detection and mitigation
• Fine-tuning for human-like outputs | • Improves model alignment with human values
• Captures nuanced preferences
• Enables continuous improvement
• Reduces harmful outputs | • Expensive and time-intensive
• Requires skilled annotators
• Potential for annotator bias
• Scalability challenges | Using platforms like Scale AI, Surge AI, or Toloka where human reviewers compare two LLM responses and select the better one for training reward models | | **Internal/Enterprise Data** | Leveraging proprietary organizational data including documents, databases, support tickets, emails, and internal knowledge bases | • Domain-specific fine-tuning
• Enterprise RAG applications
• Custom chatbots for internal use
• Knowledge management systems | • Highly relevant and specific to use case
• Proprietary competitive advantage
• Reflects actual business processes
• Better context for specialized tasks | • Privacy and security concerns
• Data governance and compliance
• May require anonymization
• Access restrictions and permissions | Collecting company's product documentation, support tickets, and internal wikis to fine-tune an LLM for customer service automation | | **Public Datasets** | Utilizing openly available curated datasets from repositories like Hugging Face, GitHub, academic institutions, or government sources | • Model pre-training
• Benchmarking and evaluation
• Transfer learning foundation
• Research and experimentation | • Free and readily accessible
• Pre-cleaned and structured
• Peer-reviewed quality
• Diverse domain coverage | • May not fit specific use cases
• Potential licensing restrictions
• Limited customization
• Risk of data contamination in benchmarks | Using datasets like Common Crawl, Wikipedia dumps, or domain-specific datasets (e.g., PubMed for medical, GitHub repos for code) from Hugging Face | | **API Integration** | Collecting data through structured APIs from external services, platforms, or data providers to access real-time or historical information | • Real-time data enrichment for RAG
• Multi-source data aggregation
• Structured data collection
• Third-party service integration | • Reliable and structured data format
• Real-time access
• Official data source validation
• Easier integration and maintenance | • API rate limits and costs
• Dependency on external services
• Data format changes
• Authentication and security | Integrating Stripe API for payment data, Twitter API for social sentiment, or weather APIs to enhance context for a customer service chatbot | | **Data Annotation & Labeling** | Manual or semi-automated process where human experts label, categorize, or structure raw data according to specific schemas for supervised learning | • Supervised fine-tuning datasets
• Ground truth creation
• Classification task training
• Named entity recognition (NER) | • High-quality labeled data
• Domain expert knowledge capture
• Customizable to specific needs
• Enables supervised learning | • Labor-intensive and expensive
• Time-consuming process
• Requires clear guidelines
• Inter-annotator agreement challenges | Using Label Studio or Labellerr where annotators classify customer inquiries by intent (billing, technical, sales) to train a routing model | | **User Interaction Logging** | Capturing and storing actual user queries, prompts, responses, and feedback from live application interactions for continuous improvement | • Model performance monitoring
• Identifying failure patterns
• A/B testing and experimentation
• Continuous model refinement | • Real-world usage patterns
• Identifies actual user needs
• Enables iterative improvement
• Direct performance feedback | • Privacy and data protection (GDPR, CCPA)
• Storage and processing costs
• Requires consent mechanisms
• PII handling and anonymization | Logging chatbot conversations with user ratings to identify common failure modes and create fine-tuning datasets from successful interactions | | **Telemetry & Observability** | Systematic collection of metrics, traces, and logs from LLM application infrastructure to understand performance, costs, and behavior patterns | • Performance optimization
• Cost monitoring and reduction
• Latency and throughput tracking
• Debugging and troubleshooting | • Visibility into system behavior
• Enables data-driven optimization
• Identifies bottlenecks
• Supports SLA compliance | • Infrastructure overhead
• Data volume management
• Analysis complexity
• Tool integration requirements | Using OpenTelemetry with tools like LangSmith or Weights & Biases to track token usage, response latency, and RAG retrieval accuracy across production deployments | | **Document Ingestion & Chunking** | Processing unstructured documents (PDFs, Word files, web pages) into smaller semantic chunks with embeddings for vector database storage | • RAG knowledge base creation
• Semantic search implementation
• Document Q&A systems
• Knowledge extraction | • Handles diverse document formats
• Optimizes for retrieval performance
• Maintains semantic coherence
• Scalable for large corpora | • Chunking strategy impacts quality
• Context window considerations
• Embedding model selection
• Processing computational costs | Using LlamaIndex or LangChain to split a 100-page technical manual into semantic chunks, generate embeddings with OpenAI, and store in Pinecone for RAG retrieval | | **Crowdsourcing** | Distributing data collection or labeling tasks to a large, distributed workforce through platforms that connect requesters with workers globally | • Large-scale data annotation
• Diverse perspective collection
• Rapid dataset creation
• Multi-lingual data gathering | • Scalable workforce
• Cost-effective for volume
• Geographic and cultural diversity
• Fast turnaround for simple tasks | • Quality control challenges
• Worker training and calibration
• Task design complexity
• Potential for low-quality submissions | Using Amazon Mechanical Turk or Appen to have thousands of workers label sentiment in product reviews or classify images for multimodal LLM training | | **Conversational Data Mining** | Extracting and analyzing existing conversational data from chat logs, forums, customer service transcripts, or social media to understand dialogue patterns | • Chatbot training
• Intent recognition
• Dialogue flow optimization
• Persona development | • Rich contextual information
• Natural language patterns
• Real conversation dynamics
• Multi-turn dialogue examples | • Privacy and consent requirements
• Data anonymization needs
• Noise and irrelevant content
• Context preservation challenges | Mining Reddit discussions or customer service chat logs to extract question-answer pairs and dialogue flows for training a conversational AI assistant | | **Active Learning** | Iteratively selecting the most informative unlabeled data points for expert annotation, where the model identifies uncertain or valuable samples to maximize learning efficiency | • Reducing annotation costs
• Targeted data labeling
• Handling class imbalance
• Cold-start scenarios with limited labels | • Maximizes label efficiency
• Focuses on difficult examples
• Reduces overall annotation costs
• Adaptable to model improvements | • Requires initial labeled dataset
• Query strategy selection complexity
• May overlook rare but important samples
• Computational overhead for uncertainty estimation | Using uncertainty sampling to identify prompts where the LLM has low confidence, then prioritizing these for human annotation to improve model performance on edge cases | | **Curriculum Learning** | Strategically ordering training data from simple to complex examples, mimicking human learning progressions to improve model convergence and generalization | • Pre-training large models
• Domain adaptation
• Multi-task learning
• Handling noisy datasets | • Faster convergence
• Better generalization
• Reduces training instability
• Improves performance on complex tasks | • Requires careful curriculum design
• Difficulty scoring can be subjective
• May delay exposure to hard examples
• Not suitable for all tasks | Training an LLM first on simple sentence completion tasks, then progressing to complex reasoning problems, and finally to multi-step dialogue tasks | | **Continual/Incremental Learning** | Continuously updating models with new data streams over time while preserving previously learned knowledge and avoiding catastrophic forgetting | • Real-time system updates
• Adapting to evolving domains
• Streaming data applications
• Dynamic knowledge bases | • Adapts to changing environments
• No need for full retraining
• Handles concept drift
• Efficient resource utilization | • Catastrophic forgetting risks
• Stability-plasticity tradeoff
• Computational complexity
• Requires careful architecture design | Continuously updating a customer service chatbot with new product information and common issues from daily interactions without losing knowledge of previous products | | **Multimodal Data Collection** | Gathering paired or aligned data across multiple modalities (text, images, audio, video) to train vision-language models or multimodal LLMs | • Vision-language model training
• Image captioning
• Visual question answering
• Multimodal RAG systems | • Enables cross-modal understanding
• Richer context and representations
• Broader application scope
• Improved user experience | • Complex alignment requirements
• Higher storage and compute costs
• Quality control across modalities
• Scarcity of high-quality paired data | Collecting image-text pairs from the web using CLIP filtering, or scraping product catalogs with images, descriptions, and specifications for multimodal e-commerce search | | **Preference Learning & Comparison Data** | Collecting human preferences by having annotators compare and rank multiple model outputs, used for alignment techniques like RLHF, DPO, and PPO | • Model alignment
• Safety tuning
• Reward model training
• Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) | • Captures nuanced human preferences
• Easier than absolute scoring
• Enables RLHF and DPO training
• Improves alignment with values | • Requires many comparisons
• Annotator subjectivity
• Expensive at scale
• Potential for annotation fatigue | Presenting two LLM responses to the same query and asking human raters to choose the better one, creating preference pairs for training a reward model or fine-tuning with DPO | | **Adversarial Data & Red Teaming** | Deliberately creating challenging, edge-case, or adversarial examples through systematic testing (red teaming) to identify model vulnerabilities and failure modes | • Safety evaluation
• Robustness testing
• Jailbreak prevention
• Bias detection | • Identifies critical weaknesses
• Improves model robustness
• Enhances safety mechanisms
• Proactive risk mitigation | • Requires security expertise
• Time-intensive process
• May not cover all attack vectors
• Ethical considerations in creating harmful content | Using automated jailbreak techniques and manual red teaming to generate adversarial prompts that attempt to bypass safety guardrails, then using these examples for adversarial training | | **Domain Adaptation & Knowledge Distillation Data** | Curating specialized domain-specific datasets from expert sources and using larger teacher models to generate training data for smaller student models | • Domain-specific fine-tuning
• Model compression
• Specialized task transfer
• Resource-constrained deployment | • Preserves performance with smaller models
• Reduces inference costs
• Enables domain specialization
• Transfer of expert knowledge | • Quality depends on teacher model
• May lose some capabilities
• Domain expertise required
• Risk of error propagation | Using GPT-4 to generate medical diagnosis examples with explanations, then distilling this knowledge into a smaller domain-specific model for clinical deployment | | **Data Versioning & Lineage Tracking** | Systematically tracking data versions, transformations, and provenance throughout the ML lifecycle using tools like DVC, lakeFS, or Pachyderm | • Experiment reproducibility
• Compliance and auditing
• Dataset evolution tracking
• Debugging data pipelines | • Full reproducibility
• Audit trail for compliance
• Easier debugging
• Team collaboration support | • Infrastructure overhead
• Storage costs
• Learning curve for tools
• Integration complexity | Using DVC to version control training datasets alongside code, tracking which data version produced which model, enabling reproducible experiments and rollback capabilities | | **Federated Data Collection** | Training models across decentralized data sources without centralizing raw data, using techniques like federated learning, differential privacy, and secure multi-party computation | • Privacy-sensitive domains
• Healthcare data
• Financial data
• Cross-organizational collaboration | • Preserves data privacy
• Regulatory compliance (GDPR)
• Enables multi-party collaboration
• Reduces data transfer costs | • Communication overhead
• Non-IID data challenges
• Model convergence difficulties
• Complex infrastructure requirements | Training a medical diagnosis LLM across multiple hospitals where patient data never leaves each institution, using federated learning with differential privacy guarantees | | **Data Quality Assessment & Validation** | Systematically evaluating and filtering training data using automated quality checks, statistical analysis, and LLM-based validation to ensure data integrity | • Pre-training data curation
• Dataset cleaning
• Detecting corrupted data
• Maintaining data standards | • Improves model performance
• Reduces training on noise
• Catches data issues early
• Maintains consistency | • Requires clear quality metrics
• Can be computationally expensive
• May inadvertently remove valuable data
• Tool and infrastructure needs | Using LLMs to score training examples for factual accuracy, coherence, and toxicity, filtering out low-quality data before fine-tuning to improve final model quality | | **Weak Supervision & Programmatic Labeling** | Using programmatic label functions, heuristics, and knowledge bases to automatically generate noisy labels, which are then aggregated and denoised using statistical models | • Large-scale labeling automation
• Rapid prototype development
• Domain rule encoding
• Cold-start scenarios | • Dramatically reduces labeling costs
• Scalable to millions of examples
• Incorporates domain expertise
• Faster iteration cycles | • Requires label function design
• Noisy labels need denoising
• May miss complex patterns
• Learning curve for frameworks | Using Snorkel to define labeling functions (e.g., keyword matching, regex patterns, distant supervision) for sentiment analysis, then training a model on the aggregated noisy labels | | **Benchmark & Evaluation Dataset Creation** | Carefully constructing test sets and benchmark datasets with diverse, challenging examples to rigorously evaluate LLM capabilities across different dimensions | • Model evaluation
• Performance tracking
• Academic research
• Public leaderboards | • Standardized comparison
• Identifies model weaknesses
• Drives research progress
• Community collaboration | • Risk of data contamination
• May not reflect real-world usage
• Expensive to create quality benchmarks
• Can become outdated quickly | Creating a domain-specific benchmark dataset for legal contract analysis with expert-annotated question-answer pairs, covering diverse contract types and legal reasoning tasks | | **Expert Annotation & Subject Matter Experts** | Engaging domain experts (doctors, lawyers, scientists) to annotate and validate specialized training data requiring deep domain knowledge | • Medical AI applications
• Legal document analysis
• Scientific literature processing
• Technical domain fine-tuning | • High-quality domain-specific labels
• Captures nuanced expertise
• Ensures accuracy in critical domains
• Improves trust and reliability | • Very expensive
• Limited expert availability
• Slow annotation process
• Requires clear guidelines and QA | Hiring practicing physicians to annotate medical imaging reports and diagnoses for training a specialized clinical LLM, ensuring medically accurate and safe outputs | | **Data Augmentation Techniques** | Systematically expanding training datasets through transformations like paraphrasing, back-translation, synonym replacement, and LLM-based generation | • Addressing data scarcity
• Improving model robustness
• Reducing overfitting
• Handling class imbalance | • Cost-effective data expansion
• Improves generalization
• Reduces overfitting
• Easy to implement | • May introduce unnatural variations
• Quality varies by technique
• Risk of maintaining biases
• Requires validation | Using back-translation (English → French → English) and LLM-based paraphrasing to generate 10 variations of each training example, expanding a small dataset for sentiment classification | | **Knowledge Graph & Entity Extraction** | Extracting structured knowledge (entities, relations, attributes) from unstructured text to build knowledge graphs for GraphRAG and structured reasoning applications | • GraphRAG implementation
• Semantic search
• Question answering systems
• Knowledge base construction | • Enables structured reasoning
• Improves retrieval precision
• Captures complex relationships
• Supports multi-hop queries | • Requires entity linking
• Relation extraction complexity
• Ambiguity resolution challenges
• Computational overhead | Using spaCy and LLMs to extract entities (people, organizations, locations) and relationships from company documents, building a knowledge graph for enterprise search and reasoning | | **Text-to-SQL & Code Dataset Creation** | Collecting or generating paired natural language queries with corresponding SQL queries or code, used for training models to translate natural language into executable code | • Natural language to SQL
• Code generation
• Database query interfaces
• Programming assistants | • Enables non-technical users
• Automates query generation
• Reduces SQL expertise requirements
• Improves accessibility | • Requires database schema knowledge
• Complex query handling challenges
• Ambiguity in natural language
• Validation and testing needs | Creating training pairs from database documentation and query logs, pairing questions like "Show me last quarter's revenue by region" with corresponding SQL SELECT statements | | **Instruction Dataset & Prompt Collection** | Systematically collecting or generating instruction-following examples (instruction, input, output triples) for instruction tuning, using formats like Alpaca or ShareGPT | • Instruction tuning
• Chat model training
• Task generalization
• Zero-shot capabilities | • Improves instruction following
• Enables task generalization
• Broadens model capabilities
• Supports diverse use cases | • Quality control challenges
• Diversity requirements
• Potential bias in instructions
• Format consistency needs | Using GPT-4 to generate diverse instruction-following examples in Alpaca format, covering tasks like summarization, translation, reasoning, and creative writing for fine-tuning a smaller model | ## References ### General Data Collection Methods 1. **AIMultiple Research** - "LLM Data Guide & 6 Methods of Collection in 2026" (https://research.aimultiple.com/llm-data/) 2. **NVIDIA Technical Blog** - "Mastering LLM Techniques: Text Data Processing" (https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/mastering-llm-techniques-data-preprocessing/) 3. **Turing.com** - "Data Collection for Building LLMs: Methods, Tools & Challenges" (https://www.turing.com/resources/data-collection-methods-and-tools-for-llms) 4. **Hugging Face Blog** - "LLM Data Engineering - Data Collection Magic" (https://huggingface.co/blog/JessyTsu1/data-collect) 5. **Writer.com** - "LLM Training Data: Why It Matters for Enterprise Generative AI" (https://writer.com/blog/llm-training-data/) 6. **Labellerr Blog** - "Data Collection and Preprocessing for Large Language Models" (https://www.labellerr.com/blog/data-collection-and-preprocessing-for-large-language-models/) 7. **Oxylabs Blog** - "LLM Training Data: The 8 Main Public Data Sources" (https://oxylabs.io/blog/llm-training-data) 8. **ScrapFly Blog** - "Guide to LLM Training, Fine-Tuning, and RAG" (https://scrapfly.io/blog/posts/guide-to-llm-training-fine-tuning-and-rag) ### Human Feedback & Reinforcement Learning 9. **Surge AI Blog** - "Anthropic Uses Surge AI's RLHF Platform" (https://surgehq.ai/blog/anthropic-surge-ai-rlhf-platform-train-llm-assistant-human-feedback) 10. **Hugging Face Blog** - "Illustrating Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)" (https://huggingface.co/blog/rlhf) 11. **Toptal** - "Data Labeling Strategies for Fine-tuning LLMs" (https://www.toptal.com/developers/artificial-intelligence/llm-data-labeling) 12. **Label Studio** - "Fine-Tuning LLMs" (https://labelstud.io/blog/fine-tuning-large-language-models/) ### Active Learning & Curriculum Learning 13. **IntuitionLabs** - "Active Learning and Human Feedback for Large Language Models" (https://intuitionlabs.ai/articles/active-learning-hitl-llms) 14. **ACL Anthology** - "A Survey of LLM-based Active Learning" (https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.708.pdf) 15. **Wiley Online Library** - "Applying LLMs to Active Learning: Toward Cost-Efficient Cross-Task Text Classification" (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/int/6472544) ### Observability & Telemetry 16. **Neptune.ai** - "LLM Observability: Fundamentals, Practices, and Tools" (https://neptune.ai/blog/llm-observability) 17. **OpenTelemetry Blog** - "An Introduction to Observability for LLM-based Applications" (https://opentelemetry.io/blog/2024/llm-observability/) ### RAG & Document Processing 18. **Weaviate Blog** - "Chunking Strategies to Improve Your RAG Performance" (https://weaviate.io/blog/chunking-strategies-for-rag) 19. **Galileo Blog** - "Mastering RAG: Advanced Chunking Techniques for LLM Applications" (https://galileo.ai/blog/mastering-rag-advanced-chunking-techniques-for-llm-applications) 20. **Databricks Community** - "The Ultimate Guide to Chunking Strategies for RAG Applications" (https://community.databricks.com/t5/technical-blog/the-ultimate-guide-to-chunking-strategies-for-rag-applications/ba-p/113089) 21. **Unstructured.io** - "Understanding What Matters for LLM Ingestion and Preprocessing" (https://unstructured.io/blog/understanding-what-matters-for-llm-ingestion-and-preprocessing) ### Conversational Data & Query Analysis 22. **SingleGrain Blog** - "LLM Query Analysis: Extracting Insights From AI Search Questions" (https://www.singlegrain.com/blog-posts/analytics/llm-query-mining-extracting-insights-from-ai-search-questions/) 23. **Pinecone** - "Conversational Memory for LLMs with Langchain" (https://www.pinecone.io/learn/series/langchain/langchain-conversational-memory/) ### Zero-Shot, Few-Shot & Transfer Learning 24. **Labelbox Guides** - "Zero-Shot Learning vs. Few-Shot Learning vs. Fine-Tuning" (https://labelbox.com/guides/zero-shot-learning-few-shot-learning-fine-tuning/) 25. **Prompt Engineering Guide** - "Zero-Shot Prompting" (https://www.promptingguide.ai/techniques/zeroshot) 26. **PMC** - "Harnessing Large Language Models' Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Learning Capabilities" (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11342240/) 27. **Medium** - "Few-Shot and Zero-Shot Learning: Unlocking Cross-Domain Generalization" (https://medium.com/@anicomanesh/mastering-few-shot-and-zero-shot-learning-in-llms-a-deep-dive-into-cross-domain-generalization-b33f779f5259) ### Continual & Incremental Learning 28. **ScienceDirect** - "Online Learning and Continuous Model Upgrading with Data Streams" (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X24002930) 29. **Cameron R. Wolfe Substack** - "Continual Learning with RL for LLMs" (https://cameronrwolfe.substack.com/p/rl-continual-learning) 30. **Striim Blog** - "Real-Time Data Stories Powering Gen AI & Large Language Models" (https://www.striim.com/blog/real-time-data-stories-powering-gen-ai-large-language-models-llm/) 31. **Estuary** - "7 Real-Time Data Use Cases for LLM-Powered Applications" (https://estuary.dev/blog/real-time-data-use-cases-llm-applications/) 32. **ACM Computing Surveys** - "Towards Lifelong Learning of Large Language Models" (https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3716629) ### Multimodal Data Collection 33. **AI Summer** - "Vision Language Models: Towards Multi-Modal Deep Learning" (https://theaisummer.com/vision-language-models/) 34. **Voxel51** - "A History of CLIP Model Training Data Advances" (https://voxel51.com/blog/a-history-of-clip-model-training-data-advances) 35. **OpenAI** - "CLIP: Connecting Text and Images" (https://openai.com/index/clip/) 36. **Roboflow Blog** - "Top 10 Multimodal Datasets for AI & Computer Vision" (https://blog.roboflow.com/top-multimodal-datasets/) 37. **Encord** - "Vision-Language Models: How They Work & Overcoming Key Challenges" (https://encord.com/blog/vision-language-models-guide/) 38. **Hugging Face Blog** - "A Dive into Vision-Language Models" (https://huggingface.co/blog/vision_language_pretraining) ### Preference Learning & Alignment 39. **arXiv** - "Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10719) 40. **Labellerr** - "DPO vs PPO: How To Align LLM" (https://www.labellerr.com/blog/dpo-vs-ppo-for-llm-all/) 41. **arXiv** - "Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18290) 42. **Vinija's Notes** - "LLM Alignment" (https://vinija.ai/concepts/llm-alignment/) 43. **Cameron R. Wolfe Substack** - "Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)" (https://cameronrwolfe.substack.com/p/direct-preference-optimization) 44. **Deepchecks** - "Mastering DPO Preference Tuning for LLMs: A Comprehensive Guide" (https://www.deepchecks.com/mastering-dpo-preference-tuning-llms-guide/) ### Adversarial Data & Red Teaming 45. **Mend.io** - "What Is LLM Red Teaming? AI Safety, Risks, and Best Practices" (https://www.mend.io/blog/llm-red-teaming-threats-testing-best-practices/) 46. **Confident AI** - "LLM Red Teaming: The Complete Step-By-Step Guide" (https://www.confident-ai.com/blog/red-teaming-llms-a-step-by-step-guide) 47. **Promptfoo** - "LLM Red Teaming Guide (Open Source)" (https://www.promptfoo.dev/docs/red-team/) 48. **Kili Technology** - "The Ultimate Guide to Red Teaming LLMs and Adversarial Prompts" (https://kili-technology.com/large-language-models-llms/red-teaming-llms-and-adversarial-prompts) 49. **Lil'Log** - "Adversarial Attacks on LLMs" (https://lilianweng.github.io/posts/2023-10-25-adv-attack-llm/) 50. **arXiv** - "Automatic LLM Red Teaming" (https://arxiv.org/html/2508.04451v1) ### Domain Adaptation & Knowledge Distillation 51. **PMC** - "Knowledge Distillation and Dataset Distillation of Large Language Models" (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12634706/) 52. **arXiv** - "DDK: Distilling Domain Knowledge for Efficient Large Language Models" (https://arxiv.org/html/2407.16154v1) 53. **Infosys** - "Generalization to Specialization – Domain Adaptation of Large Language Models" (https://www.infosys.com/iki/techcompass/large-language-models.html) 54. **Zilliz** - "Knowledge Distillation for Large Language Models: A Deep Dive" (https://zilliz.com/learn/knowledge-distillation-from-large-language-models-deep-dive) 55. **Nature** - "Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Domain Adaptation" (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41524-025-01564-y) 56. **ACL Anthology** - "Streamlining LLMs: Adaptive Knowledge Distillation for Tailored Language Models" (https://aclanthology.org/2025.naacl-srw.43/) 57. **arXiv** - "Domain Specific Specialization in Low-Resource Settings" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.16219) ### Data Versioning & MLOps 58. **lakeFS** - "26 MLOps Tools for 2026: Key Features & Benefits" (https://lakefs.io/mlops/mlops-tools/) 59. **Wikipedia** - "Data Version Control (Software)" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Version_Control_(software)) 60. **Full Stack Data Science** - "Versioning Data in MLOps with DVC" (https://fullstackdatascience.com/blogs/versioning-data-in-mlops-with-dvc-data-version-control-xm3mu5) 61. **Label Your Data** - "Data Versioning: ML Best Practices Checklist 2026" (https://labelyourdata.com/articles/machine-learning/data-versioning) 62. **DataCamp** - "25 Top MLOps Tools You Need to Know in 2026" (https://www.datacamp.com/blog/top-mlops-tools) 63. **freeCodeCamp** - "How to Build End-to-End Machine Learning Lineage" (https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/how-to-build-end-to-end-machine-learning-lineage/) ### Privacy & Federated Learning 64. **JPMorgan** - "SMPAI: Secure Multi-Party Computation for Federated Learning" (https://www.jpmorgan.com/content/dam/jpm/cib/complex/content/technology/ai-research-publications/pdf-9.pdf) 65. **ACM Digital Library** - "Optimizing Privacy in Federated Learning with MPC and Differential Privacy" (https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3654823.3654854) 66. **Springer** - "Exploring Privacy Mechanisms and Metrics in Federated Learning" (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11170-5) 67. **Medium** - "Secure Federated Learning with Differential Privacy and Homomorphic Encryption" (https://medium.com/@katesumedh/secure-federated-learning-with-differential-privacy-and-homomorphic-encryption-aa8afad13049) 68. **arXiv** - "Differentially Private Secure Multi-Party Computation for Federated Learning" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.05867) 69. **Springer** - "Enhancing Privacy Guarantees for Federated Learning with LDP and MPC" (https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-96-9958-2_32) 70. **Netguru** - "Federated Learning: A Privacy-Preserving Approach" (https://www.netguru.com/blog/federated-learning) 71. **Scientific Reports** - "Federated Learning with Differential Privacy for Breast Cancer Diagnosis" (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-95858-2) ### Data Quality & Validation 72. **Turing.com** - "Data Processing for LLMs: Techniques, Challenges & Tips" (https://www.turing.com/resources/understanding-data-processing-techniques-for-llms) 73. **O'Reilly** - "Chapter 2: Data Cleaning for LLM Training - LLM Design Patterns" (https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/llm-design-patterns/9781836207030/B31249_02.xhtml) 74. **Encord** - "Data Cleaning & Data Preprocessing for Machine Learning" (https://encord.com/blog/data-cleaning-data-preprocessing/) 75. **Oboe** - "Data Cleaning and Preprocessing - LLM and AI Data Quality Management" (https://oboe.com/learn/llm-and-ai-data-quality-management-134pje0/data-cleaning-and-preprocessing-1wb59rc) 76. **arXiv** - "Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation" (https://arxiv.org/html/2601.17058) 77. **Klu.ai** - "What is the Role of Data Quality in LLMOps?" (https://klu.ai/glossary/llm-ops-data-quality) 78. **AI Alliance** - "Mastering Data Cleaning for Fine-Tuning LLMs and RAG Architectures" (https://thealliance.ai/blog/mastering-data-cleaning-for-fine-tuning-llms-and-r) 79. **Intel Tech** - "Four Data Cleaning Techniques to Improve Large Language Model Performance" (https://medium.com/intel-tech/four-data-cleaning-techniques-to-improve-large-language-model-llm-performance-77bee9003625) ### Weak Supervision & Programmatic Labeling 80. **Snorkel AI** - "Essential Guide to Weak Supervision" (https://snorkel.ai/data-centric-ai/weak-supervision/) 81. **Towards Data Science** - "Weak Supervision: Labeling Your Data Without Actually Labeling It" (https://towardsdatascience.com/weak-supervision-with-snorkel-for-multilabel-classification-tasks-c7af4990ea45/) 82. **PMC** - "Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervision" (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5951191/) 83. **arXiv** - "Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervision" (https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.10160) 84. **Stanford AI Blog** - "Weak Supervision: A New Programming Paradigm for Machine Learning" (https://ai.stanford.edu/blog/weak-supervision/) 85. **Snorkel AI Blog** - "Alfred: Data Labeling with Foundation Models and Weak Supervision" (https://snorkel.ai/blog/alfred-data-labeling-with-foundation-models-and-weak-supervision/) ### Benchmark & Evaluation Dataset Creation 86. **GitHub** - "LLM Benchmarks Collection" (https://github.com/leobeeson/llm_benchmarks) 87. **arXiv** - "AI Benchmarks and Datasets for LLM Evaluation" (https://arxiv.org/html/2412.01020v1) 88. **Kili Technology** - "How to Build LLM Evaluation Datasets for Your Domain-Specific Use Cases" (https://kili-technology.com/large-language-models-llms/how-to-build-llm-evaluation-datasets-for-your-domain-specific-use-cases) 89. **Evidently AI** - "250 LLM Benchmarks and Evaluation Datasets" (https://www.evidentlyai.com/llm-evaluation-benchmarks-datasets) 90. **Evidently AI** - "How to Create LLM Test Datasets with Synthetic Data" (https://www.evidentlyai.com/llm-guide/llm-test-dataset-synthetic-data) 91. **Evidently AI** - "30 LLM Evaluation Benchmarks and How They Work" (https://www.evidentlyai.com/llm-guide/llm-benchmarks) 92. **Label Your Data** - "LLM Evaluation: Benchmarks to Test Model Quality in 2026" (https://labelyourdata.com/articles/llm-fine-tuning/llm-evaluation) 93. **Medium** - "LLM Benchmark Datasets for Training and Evaluation" (https://medium.com/@sulbha.jindal/llm-benchmark-datasets-for-training-and-evaluation-1ec271129d7c) 94. **Promptfoo** - "Top 10 Open Datasets for LLM Safety, Toxicity & Bias Evaluation" (https://www.promptfoo.dev/blog/top-llm-safety-bias-benchmarks/) ### Expert Annotation & Domain Specialization 95. **SuperAnnotate** - "Domain-Specific LLMs (Large Language Models)" (https://www.superannotate.com/blog/domain-specific-llms) 96. **Innodata** - "Data Annotation Services" (https://innodata.com/data-annotation/) 97. **arXiv** - "Evaluating Large Language Models as Expert Annotators" (https://arxiv.org/html/2508.07827v1) 98. **Arya.ai** - "Building Domain-Specific LLMs: A Comprehensive Guide for Enterprise Leaders" (https://arya.ai/blog/building-domain-specific-llms-for-enterprise-leaders) 99. **John Snow Labs** - "Top 6 Annotation Tools for HITL LLMs Evaluation" (https://www.johnsnowlabs.com/top-6-annotation-tools-for-hitl-llms-evaluation-and-domain-specific-ai-model-training/) 100. **Toptal** - "Data Labeling Strategies for Fine-tuning LLMs" (https://www.toptal.com/artificial-intelligence/llm-data-labeling) 101. **Toloka** - "Building a Domain-Specific LLM" (https://toloka.ai/blog/domain-specific-llm/) 102. **arXiv** - "Domain Specialization as the Key to Make Large Language Models Disruptive" (https://arxiv.org/html/2305.18703v7) ### Data Augmentation Techniques 103. **Rohan Paul** - "Data Augmentation for Enhanced Language Model Training" (https://www.rohan-paul.com/p/data-augmentation-for-enhanced-language) 104. **ACM** - "Large Language Model Data Augmentation for Text-Pair Classification Tasks" (https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3704323.3704362) 105. **ScienceDirect** - "Data Augmentation Approaches in Natural Language Processing: A Survey" (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651022000080) 106. **arXiv** - "Backtranslation and Paraphrasing in the LLM Era?" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14590) 107. **arXiv** - "Text Data Augmentation for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey" (https://arxiv.org/html/2501.18845v1) 108. **arXiv** - "LLMs vs Established Text Augmentation Techniques for Classification" (https://arxiv.org/html/2408.16502v1) ### Knowledge Graph & Entity Extraction 109. **Elasticsearch Labs** - "Graph RAG: Navigating Graphs for Retrieval-Augmented Generation" (https://www.elastic.co/search-labs/blog/rag-graph-traversal) 110. **MDPI** - "Document GraphRAG: Knowledge Graph Enhanced RAG" (https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/14/11/2102) 111. **arXiv** - "RAKG: Document-level Retrieval Augmented Knowledge Graph Construction" (https://arxiv.org/html/2504.09823v1) 112. **arXiv** - "Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Knowledge Graphs" (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.17723) 113. **arXiv** - "Knowledge Graph-Guided Retrieval Augmented Generation" (https://arxiv.org/html/2502.06864v1) 114. **GitHub** - "Awesome-GraphRAG: A Curated List of Resources" (https://github.com/DEEP-PolyU/Awesome-GraphRAG) 115. **Microsoft GraphRAG** - "GraphRAG Documentation" (https://microsoft.github.io/graphrag/) 116. **Scientific Reports** - "Research on Construction and Application of RAG Model Based on Knowledge Graph" (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-21222-z) ### Text-to-SQL & Code Generation 117. **GitHub** - "Awesome-Text2SQL: Curated Tutorials and Resources" (https://github.com/eosphoros-ai/Awesome-Text2SQL) 118. **arXiv** - "Datrics Text2SQL: A Framework for Natural Language to SQL Query Generation" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12234) 119. **GitHub** - "Text2SQL Data: A Collection of Datasets" (https://github.com/jkkummerfeld/text2sql-data) 120. **arXiv** - "DataGpt-SQL-7B: An Open-Source Language Model for Text2SQL" (https://arxiv.org/html/2409.15985v1) 121. **Yale Spider** - "Yale Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Challenge" (https://yale-lily.github.io/spider) 122. **AWS Blog** - "Generating Value from Enterprise Data: Best Practices for Text2SQL and Generative AI" (https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/generating-value-from-enterprise-data-best-practices-for-text2sql-and-generative-ai/) 123. **AWS Blog** - "Build a Robust Text-to-SQL Solution" (https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/build-a-robust-text-to-sql-solution-generating-complex-queries-self-correcting-and-querying-diverse-data-sources/) ### Instruction Tuning & Prompt Datasets 124. **Unsloth Documentation** - "Datasets Guide" (https://unsloth.ai/docs/get-started/fine-tuning-llms-guide/datasets-guide) 125. **GitHub** - "Awesome Instruction Datasets" (https://github.com/jianzhnie/awesome-instruction-datasets) 126. **Anyscale Docs** - "Dataset Preparation for LLM Post-Training" (https://docs.anyscale.com/llm/fine-tuning/data-preparation) 127. **Hugging Face** - "tatsu-lab/alpaca Dataset" (https://huggingface.co/datasets/tatsu-lab/alpaca) 128. **Debugger Cafe** - "Instruction Tuning GPT2 on Alpaca Dataset" (https://debuggercafe.com/instruction-tuning-gpt2-on-alpaca-dataset/) 129. **GitHub** - "Awesome Instruction Dataset Collection" (https://github.com/yaodongC/awesome-instruction-dataset) 130. **arXiv** - "Instruction Tuning with GPT-4" (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.03277) 131. **Zack Proser** - "How to Create a Custom Alpaca Instruction Dataset" (https://zackproser.com/blog/how-to-create-a-custom-alpaca-dataset) 132. **GitHub** - "AlpacaDataCleaned: Cleaned and Curated Alpaca Dataset" (https://github.com/gururise/AlpacaDataCleaned)

On This Page

On This Page