# UX (User Experience) Best Practices for Custom Applications with Generative AI/LLM Component User Experience (UX) design for Generative AI and LLM-powered applications requires a fundamental shift from traditional interface design principles. Unlike conventional software where outputs are deterministic and predictable, AI applications introduce uncertainty, variable latency, potential hallucinations, and probabilistic responses. These unique characteristics demand specialized UX patterns that balance user expectations with technical realities. Effective AI UX design prioritizes transparency, maintains user trust through clear communication of AI limitations, provides appropriate control mechanisms, and ensures graceful handling of failures. Best practices in this domain focus on helping users understand what the AI is doing, why it's doing it, and how to intervene when needed. By implementing these patterns—from streaming responses and progressive disclosure to citation sourcing and human-in-the-loop controls—designers can create AI applications that feel responsive, trustworthy, and empowering rather than opaque and frustrating. The goal is to augment human capabilities while keeping users informed, in control, and confident in their interactions with AI systems. | **UX Best Practice** | **Description** | **Main Usages** | **Advantages** | **Considerations** | **Example** | |----------------------|-----------------|-----------------|----------------|-------------------|-------------| | **Transparent AI Behavior** | Clearly communicating when AI is active, what it's doing, and what its limitations are through visible indicators and honest messaging | • AI capability disclosure
• Setting realistic expectations
• Distinguishing AI vs. human content
• Disclaimers and warnings | • Builds user trust
• Reduces confusion and frustration
• Manages expectations appropriately
• Improves accountability | • Balance transparency with simplicity
• Avoid overwhelming with technical details
• Update disclosures as capabilities evolve
• Legal and compliance requirements | Displaying "AI-generated response" badges, showing confidence scores, or adding disclaimers like "This AI may make mistakes. Please verify important information." | | **Streaming Responses** | Displaying LLM output token-by-token in real-time as it's generated rather than waiting for the complete response | • Chat interfaces
• Long-form content generation
• Real-time conversations
• Reducing perceived latency | • Dramatically improves perceived responsiveness
• Keeps users engaged during waits
• Allows early evaluation of responses
• More natural conversation flow | • Implement proper error handling mid-stream
• Consider network reliability
• Token rate optimization
• Stop/cancel functionality needed | ChatGPT-style interface where text appears word-by-word, allowing users to start reading before the full response completes | | **Progressive Disclosure** | Revealing AI features, capabilities, and complexity gradually based on user needs and expertise level rather than overwhelming upfront | • Onboarding new users
• Advanced feature introduction
• Reducing cognitive load
• Contextual help systems | • Prevents overwhelming new users
• Improves adoption rates
• Allows personalized learning paths
• Reduces interface complexity | • Balance discovery with accessibility
• Don't hide critical features
• Provide clear paths to advanced options
• Track feature adoption | Starting with basic prompt input, then revealing advanced options like temperature controls, few-shot examples, and system prompts as users gain experience | | **Effective Loading States** | Providing informative, contextualized feedback during AI processing with appropriate indicators that match expected wait times | • Response generation waits
• Document processing
• Model fine-tuning operations
• Data retrieval from vector stores | • Maintains engagement during delays
• Sets time expectations
• Reduces abandonment rates
• Communicates system status | • Match indicator type to wait duration
• Provide progress updates when possible
• Allow background processing
• Timeout handling | Showing "Analyzing 50 documents..." with a progress bar, or "Thinking..." animation for shorter waits, or specific messages like "Retrieving relevant context from knowledge base" | | **Graceful Error Handling** | Designing helpful, actionable error messages with clear recovery paths when AI fails or produces unexpected results | • Failed generations
• API timeouts
• Content policy violations
• Low-confidence responses | • Maintains user trust during failures
• Provides clear next steps
• Reduces support burden
• Enables self-service recovery | • Avoid technical jargon in messages
• Never blame the user
• Provide specific recovery actions
• Log errors for improvement | Instead of "Error 503", showing "I'm having trouble connecting right now. Try again in a moment, or rephrase your question." with a retry button | | **Fallback Mechanisms** | Implementing alternative pathways when primary AI processing fails, including escalation to humans or simpler models | • Primary model unavailable
• Confidence too low
• Complex edge cases
• Safety violations detected | • Ensures service continuity
• Improves reliability perception
• Captures complex cases
• Maintains user progress | • Design clear escalation hierarchies
• Seamless transitions
• Cost implications of fallbacks
• Human agent availability | If the AI chatbot can't answer after 2 attempts, showing "Let me connect you to a specialist" and seamlessly transferring to human support with full context | | **Context Awareness & Memory** | Maintaining conversation history and user preferences across sessions to provide personalized, coherent interactions | • Multi-turn conversations
• Personalized recommendations
• User preference learning
• Session continuity | • Creates more natural interactions
• Reduces repetitive inputs
• Improves relevance
• Builds rapport | • Privacy and data retention concerns
• Storage costs for history
• Context window limits
• User control over memory | Chatbot remembering "You mentioned working on a Python project earlier" or auto-filling preferences like preferred output format or expertise level | | **Input Guidance & Validation** | Providing examples, templates, and real-time feedback to help users craft effective prompts and queries | • First-time user onboarding
• Complex query construction
• Domain-specific applications
• Reducing poor results | • Improves output quality
• Reduces trial-and-error
• Educates users on effective prompting
• Lowers support needs | • Don't over-constrain creativity
• Balance guidance with flexibility
• Adaptive to user skill level
• Cultural and language sensitivity | Showing prompt examples like "Try: 'Write a professional email declining a meeting'", auto-suggestions, or character counters with optimal length indicators | | **Citation & Source Transparency** | Displaying sources, references, and provenance for AI-generated information to enable verification and combat hallucinations | • Research assistants
• Information retrieval
• Content summarization
• Fact-checking workflows | • Enables verification
• Reduces hallucination impact
• Builds credibility
• Supports accountability | • Source accuracy validation
• UI clutter management
• Retrieval quality requirements
• Copyright and attribution | RAG application showing clickable footnotes like "[1] Source: company_policy.pdf, page 12" or inline citations that link to original documents | | **Human-in-the-Loop Controls** | Providing mechanisms for users to review, approve, edit, or override AI decisions before they take effect | • High-stakes decisions
• Content publishing workflows
• Automated actions
• Compliance requirements | • Maintains user autonomy
• Reduces error consequences
• Builds trust and adoption
• Meets regulatory needs | • Balance automation with friction
• Clear approval processes
• Log decisions for auditing
• Define intervention thresholds | Email drafting assistant showing "Review before sending" with edit capabilities, or automated report generation requiring manager approval before distribution | | **Confidence & Uncertainty Display** | Showing AI confidence levels, uncertainty indicators, or alternative suggestions when the model is unsure | • Ambiguous queries
• Low-confidence predictions
• Multiple valid interpretations
• Risk-sensitive applications | • Sets appropriate expectations
• Enables informed decisions
• Reduces blind trust
• Encourages verification | • Avoid over-technical displays
• Calibrate confidence accurately
• Don't overwhelm users
• Context-appropriate granularity | Showing "I'm not very confident about this answer" or displaying multiple options with confidence percentages: "Python (85%), Java (12%), C++ (3%)" | | **Conversational Affordances** | Designing interfaces that support natural dialogue patterns including clarifications, follow-ups, and conversational repair | • Chatbots and assistants
• Voice interfaces
• Interactive workflows
• Customer support systems | • Feels more natural and intuitive
• Supports complex interactions
• Enables progressive refinement
• Reduces user frustration | • Handle ambiguity gracefully
• Support interruptions
• Maintain context coherence
• Avoid overly human-like behavior | Allowing users to say "Make it shorter" or "Can you explain that differently?" without repeating the entire context, with AI understanding the reference | | **Feedback Collection Mechanisms** | Implementing thumbs up/down, ratings, and detailed feedback options to improve AI systems and understand user satisfaction | • Model performance evaluation
• RLHF data collection
• Issue identification
• Continuous improvement | • Identifies failure patterns
• Enables iterative refinement
• User voice in development
• Prioritizes improvements | • Minimize friction for feedback
• Act on collected feedback
• Privacy in feedback collection
• Incentivize participation | Thumbs up/down buttons after each response, optional detailed feedback forms, or "Was this helpful?" prompts with specific improvement suggestions | | **Explainability & Reasoning Display** | Showing the AI's reasoning process, thought chain, or decision factors to help users understand how conclusions were reached | • Complex decision support
• Educational applications
• Trust-building scenarios
• Debugging and validation | • Increases trust and transparency
• Educational value
• Enables error detection
• Supports accountability | • Balance detail with comprehension
• Performance overhead for reasoning
• May expose limitations
• Cognitive load management | Showing "I reached this conclusion because: 1) Document X mentions... 2) Policy Y states... 3) Historical data shows..." or step-by-step reasoning chains | | **Accessible & Inclusive Design** | Ensuring AI interfaces work with assistive technologies and accommodate diverse user needs including disabilities | • Screen reader compatibility
• Voice input support
• Visual accessibility
• Cognitive accessibility | • Expands user base
• Legal compliance (ADA, WCAG)
• Ethical responsibility
• Better for all users | • Test with assistive technologies
• Provide multiple interaction modes
• Clear, simple language
• Cultural sensitivity | Voice-enabled AI assistant supporting hands-free operation, proper ARIA labels for screen readers, high-contrast modes, and clear language avoiding jargon | | **Undo, Edit & Regenerate Options** | Allowing users to easily modify inputs, regenerate outputs, or revert changes without losing context or starting over | • Content generation tools
• Iterative refinement workflows
• Exploratory interactions
• Creative applications | • Reduces commitment anxiety
• Encourages experimentation
• Supports iterative improvement
• Recovers from mistakes | • State management complexity
• History storage requirements
• Clear visual indicators
• Version tracking | "Regenerate" button to get alternative responses, "Edit prompt" to refine without retyping everything, or "Undo last change" to revert modifications | | **Multimodal Interaction Support** | Enabling users to interact through multiple channels (text, voice, images, gestures) based on context and preference | • Voice + text interfaces
• Image + text queries
• Gesture-based inputs
• Hybrid workflows | • Accommodates user preferences
• Suits different contexts
• Richer input capabilities
• Accessibility benefits | • Consistent experience across modes
• Mode-switching clarity
• Technical complexity
• Processing cost variations | Allowing users to upload an image and ask "What's in this picture?" or switch between typing and voice input mid-conversation based on their environment | | **Clear Boundaries & Limitations** | Explicitly communicating what the AI can and cannot do, avoiding overselling capabilities or creating unrealistic expectations | • Feature introduction
• Onboarding flows
• Out-of-scope queries
• Capability updates | • Prevents misuse
• Reduces disappointment
• Improves appropriate usage
• Manages liability | • Balance honesty with marketing
• Update as capabilities evolve
• Context-specific messaging
• Avoid over-technical language | "I can help with general coding questions but cannot execute code or access external databases" or "I'm optimized for English and may not perform well in other languages" | | **Response Customization Controls** | Providing user controls for output style, length, tone, technical level, and format preferences | • Content generation
• Report creation
• Code generation
• Communication drafting | • Personalized outputs
• Reduces post-editing needs
• Accommodates different audiences
• User empowerment | • Balance options with simplicity
• Sensible defaults
• Preview capabilities
• Persistent preferences | Sliders or dropdowns for "Response length" (brief/moderate/detailed), "Tone" (formal/casual/technical), "Expertise level" (beginner/intermediate/expert) | ## References 1. **Designing for Analytics** - "LLMs need UX: How to Increase Your B2B Product's Value with AI" (https://designingforanalytics.com/resources/ui-ux-design-for-enterprise-llms-use-cases-and-considerations-for-data-and-product-leaders-in-2024-part-1/) 2. **Microsoft Learn** - "Creating a Dynamic UX: Guidance for Generative AI Applications" (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-cloud/dev/copilot/isv/ux-guidance) 3. **Nebuly Blog** - "LLM User Experience" (https://www.nebuly.com/blog/llm-user-experience) 4. **Ramotion Agency** - "AI & LLM for UX Design" (https://www.ramotion.com/blog/ai-and-llm-for-ux-design/) 5. **MetaDialog Blog** - "AI and LLM for UX: Examples, Opportunities and Challenges" (https://www.metadialog.com/blog/ai-and-llm-for-ux-examples-opportunities-and-challenges/) 6. **UX Studio Team** - "What You Need to Know About Chatbot UI" (https://www.uxstudioteam.com/ux-blog/chatbot-ui) 7. **Cloudscape Design System** - "Generative AI Loading States" (https://cloudscape.design/patterns/genai/genai-loading-states/) 8. **Parallel HQ Blog** - "Chatbot UX Design: Complete Guide (2025)" (https://www.parallelhq.com/blog/chatbot-ux-design) 9. **Mind the Product** - "Nine UX Best Practices for AI Chatbots: A Product Manager's Guide" (https://www.mindtheproduct.com/deep-dive-ux-best-practices-for-ai-chatbots/) 10. **LangChain Documentation** - "Streaming" (https://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langgraph/streaming) 11. **Vellum AI** - "What is LLM Streaming and How to Use It?" (https://www.vellum.ai/llm-parameters/llm-streaming) 12. **Medium (Ansil M B)** - "Streaming LLM Responses in Real Time" (https://medium.com/@ansilproabl/streaming-llm-responses-in-real-time-705b8784fae5) 13. **ShapeofAI** - "AI UX Patterns: Citations" (https://www.shapeof.ai/patterns/citations) 14. **Nielsen Norman Group** - "AI Hallucinations: What Designers Need to Know" (https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ai-hallucinations/) 15. **Medium (Yimin Wu)** - "Combating AI Hallucinations: Ensuring Reliable Insights in UX Design" (https://medium.com/@angel480jp/combating-ai-hallucinations-ensuring-reliable-insights-in-ux-design-5fffc6225aa1) 16. **Google PAIR** - "Errors + Graceful Failure" (https://pair.withgoogle.com/chapter/errors-failing/) 17. **Kognitos Blog** - "How to Manage AI Errors" (https://www.kognitos.com/blog/how-to-manage-ai-errors/) 18. **Nexus Flow Innovations** - "Error Handling and Fallback Mechanisms in AI Assistants" (https://www.nexusflowinnovations.com/blog/error-handling-fallback-mechanisms-ai-assistants) 19. **arXiv** - "On the Way to LLM Personalization: Learning to Remember User Conversations" (https://arxiv.org/html/2411.13405v1) 20. **Tribe AI** - "Beyond the Bubble: How Context-Aware Memory Systems Are Changing the Game in 2025" (https://www.tribe.ai/applied-ai/beyond-the-bubble-how-context-aware-memory-systems-are-changing-the-game-in-2025) 21. **UXPin Blog** - "What is Progressive Disclosure?" (https://www.uxpin.com/studio/blog/what-is-progressive-disclosure/) 22. **AI UX Design Guide** - "Progressive Disclosure" (https://www.aiuxdesign.guide/patterns/progressive-disclosure) 23. **LogRocket Blog** - "Progressive Disclosure in UX Design: Types and Use Cases" (https://blog.logrocket.com/ux-design/progressive-disclosure-ux-types-use-cases/) 24. **Auf Ait UX** - "Human in the Loop UX" (https://www.aufaitux.com/blog/human-in-the-loop-ux/) 25. **Stanford HAI** - "Humans in the Loop: The Design of Interactive AI Systems" (https://hai.stanford.edu/news/humans-loop-design-interactive-ai-systems) 26. **Permit.io Blog** - "Human-in-the-Loop for AI Agents: Best Practices, Frameworks, Use Cases" (https://www.permit.io/blog/human-in-the-loop-for-ai-agents-best-practices-frameworks-use-cases-and-demo) 27. **UX Matters** - "Accessibility and AI: Designing for Inclusive Futures" (https://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2025/11/accessibility-and-ai-designing-for-inclusive-futures.php) 28. **Medium (Rounak Agrawal)** - "Voice Interfaces, AI, and Accessibility: A New Era of Inclusive Design" (https://medium.com/@rounakbajoriastar/voice-interfaces-ai-and-accessibility-a-new-era-of-inclusive-design-bdae509c0318) 29. **Fuselab Creative** - "AI-Driven Accessibility in UX: Inclusive Design for All" (https://fuselabcreative.com/ai-driven-accessibility-in-ux-designing-inclusive-intelligent-interfaces/) 30. **W3C WAI** - "Accessibility, Usability, and Inclusion" (https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-usability-inclusion/)

On This Page

On This Page